Well, you are relentless, I'll give you that. IMO you misrepresented me when in response to my apology you replied with a statement contained in quotation marks. Perhaps you were quoting yourself from some other writing? Or quoting someone else in a galaxy far far away?
I would like to hear your explanation of that particular use of quotation marks. ________________________________ From: authfriend <authfri...@yahoo.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, October 6, 2012 2:36 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: ATT: Share (was Best TM Rumor to Judy and PS to laughingG) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: <snip> > > Later when I apologized to everyone, including you, you > > responded by misrepresenting me. In what I deem a sneaky > > and dirty fighting way. > > I never misrepresented you, Share. Share, when I read this again, I realized how revealing what you say is. You are so allergic to reality, especially concerning yourself, that *being told the truth* seems to you to be "sneaky" and "dirty fighting" and "misrepresentational"--no matter how faithful it is to the reality. Forums that keep archives of what has been posted are different than what happens in daily life. There's a record of one's interactions, of what one has said to others. One can often get away with slanting and distorting the facts thereof in daily life because there is no such record, and folks' memories are not always perfect. On a forum that keeps archives, *you cannot edit what you've said after the fact*. You can delete a post you wish you had never made, but if someone has already responded to it and quoted it, that isn't going to help. Editing the reality of what you've said on a forum like this to make it conform to what you would like to have said is much more difficult when there is a searchable record of the posts.
