Mike, You should read the article that Curtis found from the Huffington Post which essentially stated that Romney used a sly debating number on Obama. Romney may have outwardly won the debate. But the American public now know the inner motivations of Romney as a legitimate candidate for president of this country.
If Romney had used questionable facts and half truths to confuse Obama and the public during the debate, I believe the American viewers will turn against him. In the end, these debates may backfire on him once the public realize what he did in front of all Americans to see, specifically those rapid talking and rehearsed tricks to confuse the listeners. Nonetheless, Obama will have to hold his own during the debates and present his vision of America for the next four years. JR --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon <mdixon.6569@...> wrote: > > Yes John, we laughed hysterically at the Al Gore theory and watching Chris > Mathews, we realized it wasn't a tingle up his leg but rather a warm trickle > down it. What was even funnier about the Gore idea, were the sound effects of > the "pundits" around him as he said it. It kind of reminded me of Family Feud > when some dimwit gives a horrible answer and everybody in the family screams > Great Answer! ROFLMAO! The thing is,(that sounds so Maharishi) we know what > the problem was, no record to defend and no teleprompter to tell him what to > say. Obama is a very good and convincing public speaker but only when he has > a teleprompter. Haven't you seen other events when he either leaves the > teleprompter or loses his place?His mind freezes up and then he stutters and > hems and haws till he finds his place, if he can. In the debate, neither side > had one, and they had to rely on their own abilities to understand and > communicate. Obama failed miserably. No doubt he will > come out swinging at the next debate but then he has to be cautious that he > doesn't come off as an angry black man. That could scare the Raunchydogs of > America. > > > > ________________________________ > From: John <jr_esq@...> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Saturday, October 6, 2012 1:49 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Romney is a Liar > > > Â > > Mike, > > Many of the pundits on TV have already determined that Obama did not do well > to present his case to the American people during the debate. IMO, everyone, > including Chris Matthes, was mystified at Obama's performance. Al Gore > mentioned that it may have been due to the altitude of Denver. We will > eventually find out for sure after the debates are done. > > Nonetheless, most of the voters have already decided who they will vote for > based on the core platforms of the candidates. These debates will only sway > those voters who are still undecided. If Obama could sway into his camp half > of the undecided voters, he could win. Based on an analysis by a TV > commentator, many of these voters are women and are more likely to vote for > Obama. > > JR > > --- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon <mdixon.6569@> > wrote: > > > > John, did you see the whole tape of Romney making the 47% comment? Probably > > not.Most media outlets only played a small snippet. FNC played much more, > > to put it in context. > > ÃÂ He was commenting that he would probably be wasting his time trying to > > attract them(the 47%) with aÃÂ tax cut since they don'tÃÂ pay federal > > income tax already and are probably already receiving a government hand > > out, food stamps, extended unemployment benefits etc.It made him sound as > > if he doesn't care about those people and *that* is what he apologized for. > > If you are such a Romney hater, you would have studied his tax records that > > he released and would have found that he gives about 30% of his income to > > charity. He also has a reputation of giving his time , money, counseling > > and ministering, to people in his congregation in times of need. As Obama > > said, if you don't have a record to run on,then you attack your > > opponent(personally).Example in case, Romney gives people cancer, hasn't > > paid taxes in 10 years, the lies go on, including Romney is a liar, but > > we're on to that one. They tried that on Bush.ÃÂ Romney has a wonderful > > record of > success, Obama > > has a horrible record as a failure. Obama couldn't even look Romney in the > > eyes at the debate. He came off as the failure he is and had to stand > > before 60 -70 million people tuning in, without a teleprompter feeding him > > what he needed to say. Obama couldn't bring up the 47% comment because > > Romney was right there to counter him with the whole truth. That 47% thing > > is only effective in a 30 second TV spot where it can't be challenged. > > ÃÂ > > > > ________________________________ > > From: John <jr_esq@> > > To: mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Saturday, October 6, 2012 12:30 PM > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Romney is a Liar > > > > > > ÃÂ > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, "richardatrwilliamsdotus" > > <richard@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > jr_esq: > > > > Romney had to admit that he was wrong.. > > > > > > > The IRS's Web page backs up Mr. Romney's > > > figure as true. > > > > > > "It is true that 46 percent of American > > > households did not pay federal income > > > taxes last year, according to the Tax > > > Policy Center." > > > > > > The Huffington Post: > > > http://tinyurl.com/93vhmyz > > > > > > > Why beat a dead horse? Romney already admitted he was wrong. Case closed. > > >
