Emily... actually, I never *wished* legitimate rape and abortion on Raunchy. I 
would never *wish* that on anybody. Just as I would never wish death on 
anybody.However, she did tell me to go... myself. I responded with, I'll try it 
*if* you'll do what I suggested.It was her choice, not mine. I certainly am not 
going to F myself, so I certainly wouldn't expect her to voluntarily get raped 
and then have an abortion, as important as it (abortion) is to her since of 
security.  I was simply returning her rudeness with my own and  as I did with 
you and Ravi. Turning the other cheek is more my norm, but striking back, on 
occasion, can be a little exhilarating. It reminds me of a story. A cobra used 
to bite people walking along a path causing people to die. A saint came along 
and told the snake how his karma would return to him and he should stop. The 
snake turned over a new leaf and stopped biting but the people were mad and 
beat him up with sticks and
 stones. The saint came back and saw the snake with cuts and bruises and asked 
"whats wrong"?.The snake said he stopped biting and this is what happened. The 
saint said "I didn't tell you that you can't hisssssssss." Life requires a 
little rajas.

 

________________________________
 From: emilymae.reyn <emilymae.r...@yahoo.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2012 7:15 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Romney is a Liar
  

   
 
Mike:  I just got to this as I rarely read you either. I agree that very little 
of what I write is of interest.  I'm pretty bored with myself also.  I need to 
engage in a more disciplined spiritual practice and check back here in 20 
years. 

Yes, of course, you may return the favor.  FOAD was stated to you only in a 
rhetorical sense and in response to the level of rudeness I perceived in your 
carefully worded post to Raunchy.  As a female, it gets under my skin when I 
read that someone is wishing "legitimate rape and abortion" on another.  I am 
trying not to take so many things at face value so thanks for explaining what 
you were aiming for. 

--- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon <mdixon.6569@...> 
wrote:
>
> Ravioli, I rarely read any of your posts. I found the one or two that I did 
> read,  in the past, uninteresting and boring. But don't take that 
> personally. I delete about 95% of the posts I get from FFL without reading 
> them. I just check in to see what other transcendental meditators are 
> thinking these days and there are only a handful of people on FFL that I will 
> actually read, you're not one of them. I have enjoyed some of Raunchydogs 
> posts in the past but I figured she was *trying* to push my buttons so I 
> returned the favor. Emily is another such as yourself, uninteresting and I 
> rarely read her posts as well. But I thought if she is willing to dish out an 
> F.Y. and a FOAD she would be willing to receive them in return. However, I 
> never wish death on anyone. I did once and they died. I really felt bad and 
> haven't done it since. Ravi, you haven't thrown kerosene on your wife and lit 
> it lately? Geez, I hope not. Divorce is costly but far less
 violent and
>  you wouldn't want to kill or disfigure the mother of your children.We just 
> don't need that dowry setting, snake charming,little girl aborting, caste 
> system shit over here. What was that about cattle mating? Is that still a 
> problem in the *old* country?
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...>
> To: "mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com"; 
> <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2012 3:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Romney is a Liar
> 
> 
>   
> 
> LOL..Mikey boy, You may try hard but you are nothing but a fucking racist, 
> misogynist hiding behind your conservative beliefs. The fact that you have 
> avoided replying to my message and rather use violent language and abuse 
> against women is indicative of this rotting teeth, cattle mating Appalachian 
> mindset. What a piece of work you are.
> 
> 
> On Oct 9, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Mike Dixon <mdixon.6569@...> wrote:
> 
> 
>   
> >I'll make a deal" was they key phrase. I'll try to do what you suggested I 
> >do *IF* you'll do what I suggested for you, your choice. "Legitimately 
> >raped", completely intended to evoke your hatred of Todd Akin and his views 
> >on abortion( I knew that would set you off!) and why you said you were 
> >voting for Obama in an earlier post, because if you were to get raped you 
> >could get an abortion. That is a *wonderful* reason to vote for somebody 
> >that has run up a 16 trillion dollar debt, 23 million unemployed or under 
> >employed, added a new entitlement program, when the rest are in trouble. Do 
> >I need to go on? But you, of all people, fear pregnancy.Actually, I 
> >described Obama's demeanor as a 'Little boy being scolded for playing hooky 
> >for the past four years, a big difference from referring to him as *boy*. I 
> >noticed Romney at one point, when Obama kept lying about Romney's budget, 
> >said "I have five *boys* that believe if they keep repeating something 
> >untrue ,
>  that I'll eventually believe them". Of course this was taken the same way by 
> some paranoid fools the  way Raunchy is trying to portray my comment. That 
> Romney was calling Obama  *boy*. Deny your accusations of racism? Why 
> bother? To me, it's like water off of a duck's back.That is the  first,most 
> common, over used, insult a liberal can hurl once they've failed at their 
> argument! It means I've won! Anyone who is not a bleeding heart liberal can 
> and should wear that *insult* as a badge of honor.
> >
> > 
> >
> >________________________________
> > From: raunchydog <raunchydog@...>
> >To: mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com 
> >Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2012 2:02 PM
> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Romney is a Liar
> > 
> >
> >  
> >
> >
> >--- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon <mdixon.6569@> 
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Emily.... go fuck yourself.  I'm sure Raunchydog has numerous dildos 
> >> you could barrow.Every word I wrote in response to the Raunch was 
> >> carefully thought out and used. 
> >
> >Mike: "I'll make a deal with you Raunch. I'll make an attempt to Fuck myself 
> >if you'll get legitamtely raped and have a free Obama abortion. That's the 
> >one time I could look the other way on that issue. Some genes just shouldn't 
> >reproduce under any circumstances."
> >
> >If Mike's misogynistic rant is an example of carefully thought out words, 
> >then something is seriously wrong in wingnut land. 
> >
> >> What I wrote was intended to evoke total outrage and to show you people, 
> >> libtards, can dish it out but that you claim victimization when it's 
> >> thrown back in your face.
> >
> >Nope. What Mike wrote invoked the right wing canard "legitimate rape" 
> >offered in a bill co-sponsored by Todd Akin, the Missouri jackass who wants 
> >to change language about federal funding for abortions for victims of "rape" 
> >to cover only "forcible rape" and stupidly said, "If it's a legitimate rape, 
> >the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down." Todd Akin 
> >and Mike are misogynistic idiots cut from the same cloth. 
> >
> >Mike referred to President Obama as a "boy" knowing full well the historical 
> >context of its use to emasculate, humiliate and dehumanize a black man. Mike 
> >also falsely alluded to my satirical use of the 100th Money effect to 
> >determine which party will win the election, as a racist dog whistle, and 
> >that the satire implied black people looked like monkeys. Nothing could have 
> >been further from my mind. 
> >
> >Mike: "Monkey see, Monkey do? Raunchy, don't you see the racism in what you 
> >just said? Howard Cosell almost lost his job for making a similar comment."
> >
> >Only a racist such as Mike could have conjured up such an ugly accusation. 
> >
> >That's when I decide I'd had enough of his racist bullshit:
> >
> >RD: "Go fuck yourself, Mike. You racist sack of shit."
> >
> >Funny thing is, Mike *still* doesn't object to be called a racist sack of 
> >shit. He wears it well.
> >
> >> I don't normally resort to personal attacks on people. I usually let BS 
> >> slide. However, after a few minutes of thought, I decided to have a little 
> >> mischievous fun and watch the fireworks.< As for hate, that's a pretty 
> >> strong word in itself. I truly don't hate Obama or anybody. I understand 
> >> you would find that hard to believe. The only positive I have seen from 
> >> Obama's election is that the race barrier to the presidency has been 
> >> broken. But I never believed his BS, not the hope- n -change, the new day, 
> >> the transparency, the working with the other side, his name alone would 
> >> smooth things over in the middle- east ,none of it.
> >>  He spoke in such generalities that anybody in a state of desperation 
> >> could easily say "He wants exactly what I want, I'm going to help get him 
> >> elected"and most were young stupid and idealistic. You will notice, the 
> >> day after the election, he didn't get near the votes he got last time. To 
> >> the nation, fool me once , shame on you, fool me twice , shame on me. His 
> >> background is specious and his policies have nearly destroyed or at least 
> >> put in jeopardy, nearly everything this country has built over the past 
> >> 200+ years. I believe that he and his unthinking minions truly believe 
> >> they are transforming the world into a better place but I also believe you 
> >> guys are dead wrong and creating a mess that may not be able to be undone 
> >> and destroying, unintentionally, the greatest nation and civilization this 
> >> world has ever known. You guys are tired of golden eggs and now want to 
> >> eat the goose that lays them. You guys don't believe in American 
> >> exceptional-ism but
>  want
> >>  us to be more like Europe, something my ancestors left behind. I have no 
> >> interest in living in another Greece, Italy, France, Ireland, 
> >> England etc. When you stop *feeling* and start thinking, you'll wake 
> >> up. Until then,I hope you enjoy your wet dream.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ________________________________
> >>  From: Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@>
> >> To: "mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com"; 
> >> <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> 
> >> Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2012 9:07 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Romney is a Liar
> >> 
> >> 
> >>   
> >> 
> >> Mike, there is a difference between telling someone to "go fuck 
> >> themselves" [which is a term most teens and adults are familiar with as 
> >> meaning "I think you are an asshole and an idiot" given what you are 
> >> suggesting or what you have said to me in (strong language, because I am 
> >> so offended at what you have said)] and suggesting that someone go get 
> >> themselves "legitimately raped followed by an abortion" - free or not, 
> >> does that make a difference here?  Clearly you hate Obama - does that 
> >> mean you hate everyone who doesn't?  
> >> 
> >> What is with this term of late?  "Rape"?  Seriously? 
> >>  Legitimately?  Without even the word "psychological" before it? 
> >>  Raunchy?  Mike, you need some serious help with your anger issues. 
> >>  
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ________________________________
> >>  From: Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@>
> >> To: "mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com"; 
> >> <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> 
> >> Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2012 8:38 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Romney is a Liar
> >> 
> >> 
> >>   
> >> Dear Mike:  I believe it may be appropriate to use the acronym I've 
> >> been waiting to use.  
> >> 
> >> To you, I say:  FOAD...sounds like toad, which makes it all the more 
> >> appealing.  
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ________________________________
> >>  From: Mike Dixon <mdixon.6569@>
> >> To: "mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com"; 
> >> <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> 
> >> Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2012 6:05 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Romney is a Liar
> >> 
> >> 
> >>   
> >> I'll make a deal with you Raunch. I'll make an attempt to Fuck myself if 
> >> you'll get legitamtely raped and have a free Obama abortion. That's the 
> >> one time I could look the other way on that issue. Some genes just 
> >> shouldn't reproduce under any circumstances.
> >> 
> >> From: raunchydog <raunchydog@>
> >> To: mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com 
> >> Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:13 PM
> >> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Romney is a Liar
> >> 
> >> 
> >>   
> >> 
> >> 
> >> --- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon <mdixon.6569@> 
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Monkey see, Monkey do? Raunchy, don't you see the racism in what you 
> >> > just said? Howard Cosell almost lost his job for making a similar 
> >> > comment.
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> Go fuck yourself, Mike. You racist sack of shit.
> >> 
> >> > 
> >> > ________________________________
> >> >  From: raunchydog <raunchydog@>
> >> > To: mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com 
> >> > Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2012 4:59 PM
> >> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Romney is a Liar
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> >   
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > --- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, "seekliberation" 
> >> > <seekliberation@> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > that goes back to many posts that i've done before.  I've always 
> >> > > believed vehemently in MMY's quote:  "government is an innocent 
> >> > > reflection of collective consciousness". 
> >> > > 
> >> > > That being said, why do we get upset with our politicians?  How is it 
> >> > > that we have politicians who run up big deficits, cheat on their 
> >> > > spouses, and lie about it?  Because we have people in our society who 
> >> > > max out credit cards, cheat on their spouses, and lie about it.  We 
> >> > > shouldn't expect anything more from our leaders than we ourselves are. 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > seekliberation
> >> > 
> >> > Since you're speculating that politicians reflect the behavior of their 
> >> > constituents, as in "monkey see monkey do," the 100th monkey effect 
> >> > seems to be an appropriate model to test your theory. Once a critical 
> >> > number of Republicans vs. Democrats lie, cheat and steal, how will this 
> >> > behavior, as it spreads instantaneously to all Republican and Democratic 
> >> > politicians, affect the outcome of the presidential election? Based on 
> >> > your theory, it's an infallible formula. The political party first to 
> >> > achieve the 100th monkey effect will win the election. Only one or the 
> >> > other, Republicans or Democrats will get exactly the politicians they 
> >> > deserve. 
> >> > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > --- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
> >> > > <sharelong60@> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Reading this seekliberation, the thought came that if we want honest 
> >> > > > politicians we have to start by being honest 
> >> > > > ourselves.ÃÆ'‚  Probably also applies if wanting 
> >> > > > honest gurus, honest spouses, honest friends, etc.
> >> > > > 
> >>
>

   
      

Reply via email to