Dear Buck, I began posting on FFL in order to learn something more about the world and about myself. So one of my motives in writing is to figure things out. I would like you to make me less stupid about something than I am right now: I think I can understand theoretically what you are doing here with regard to wanting to censor certain posters--make the universe a nicer, happier, purer place. What I am completely confounded by, however, Buck, is *your method of accomplishing, or trying to accomplish, this*. It seems you are trying to create a reaction which is antithetical to your purpose, because I can't believe your way of going about trying to influence the readers (or moderators) on FFL is designed to do anything but confirm each person in the conviction that the very last thing they would ever agree to would be to have you edit FFL.
Do you understand my question, Buck? Your psychology in this matter defies my comprehension. If I were truly offended and outraged by the scatological or irreverent or vicious material that was being posted on FFL [supposing there is material which in some minds at least conforms to this description]--and I *really* wanted to do something about this, my chosen strategy would would be to eliminate the possibility of appearing as if someone who was actually determined to make every reader believe *much more in the cause of freedom of speech than they ever would have had you not started your moral campaign here against what you consider non-spiritually uplifting posts*. Same with your determinism to change the rule for Dome pass privileges. I am entirely sincere here, Buck: how can your perception of this phenomenon of inappropriate and spiritually toxic posts be a true perception if it issues in a response which is calculated to elicit the very opposite response from the one that presumably would be what you would desire. You have entirely confused me in this, Buck. You would mock yourself in the extremity of your anti-ironic seriousness. You want people to ridicule you, to see you as a hectoring and feckless prig--This surely must be your secret intention. I mean I do not support any form of censorship on FFL--but if I were asked to debate (just for the fun of it) the motion: FFL Should be Subject to Censorship Based on What Is Considered Spiritually Positive Posts--and I had to argue for the motion--my approach would be so far from the one you have adopted here. You're like a guy who is throwing a fight--you want the purportedly salacious and desecrating posts to continue unabated right? Remember, Buck, I am addressing this question *only because I cannot compute what you are doing*. It seems you are deliberately and systematically determined to undermine your avowed purpose in the most efficient way that I could conceive of. It almost seems willfully destructive and a self-parody. Am I misunderstanding you, Buck? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > Dear Rick, I think it is time that we be spiritually proactive here and > > > hire an editor for FFL. I'd like to volunteer for the job. Are you > > > going to give me the password to FFL peacefully to do the hard work here > > > or what? > > > Your Friend, > > > -Buck > > > > > > > I'd stand on my best judgement for the job and that would be better than > > what we have now with no editing. I feel people could trust me. All in > > favor? > > > > You see? As we've come to know on FFL that silence means agreement. By the > silence here we'd have to say everyone seems to agree with me. > Thank you everyone. I could start work right away. I like things clean and > tidy. > -Buck > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > You know, by experience and certainly the science is showing this now, > > > > I think it is important that we look out for people now. As an older > > > > generation of elders look out spiritually for things. > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" > > > > > <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > There's also this option: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://youtu.be/OsX2Q3M8vMo > > > > > > > > > > Om my Gawd, people who listen to that are certainly going down the > > > > > road to hell! That is horible head-banging discord. People > > > > > obviously have not an Idea what that does to a nervous system. It's > > > > > simply shocking. > > > > > Let this erase all of that: > > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQVz6vuNq7s&feature=related > > > > > Turn up yur speakers and yur hearing aids, > > > > > -Buck > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lines on air, Buck. Or better yet, lines in akasha. They > > > > > > > dissolve as they're being drawn. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you post some pictures of Kali, Lakshmi, Saraswati? I'm > > > > > > > unskilled in that dept of picture posting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Leaving it all up to MahaKali... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > From: Buck > > > > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 9:14 AM > > > > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Moderating FFL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > Dear FFL Moderator, he is blaspheme-ing again against spiritual > > > > > > > things here. I am finding I can not open FFL but for fear of the > > > > > > > terrible imaging that gits paraded here either in word or picture > > > > > > > by some that clearly are designed to pollute and we will all then > > > > > > > have to carry in to the day of our lives in our chits. Would you > > > > > > > please remove his posts from the archive. I do not feel they are > > > > > > > representative of the good and spiritual people who really are > > > > > > > FFL. And, please drop his membership to the group while you are > > > > > > > at it. > > > > > > > Kindly, > > > > > > > -Buck in the Dome > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
