Is this is Raunchy?  Is this it?  Do I finally graduate to Stoopid
Steve.  I mean Judy annointed Stupid Sal.  Last week R avi annointed
Stupid Susan.  Are you going to make it a hat trick and annoint Stoopid
Steve?

Are you going to crown me Raunchy?  One of three SS's


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@...>
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" authfriend@ wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1"
<lurkernomore20002000@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm glad you've found a way to save face Raunchy. That's
> > > important.
> > >
> > > Sort of like when Ravi misuses a word, gets embarassed, and
> > > then finds some tertiary definition to make it look like he
> > > knew what he was talking about.
> >
> > You have become such a creep, Steve. Home life not going
> > so well? Business problems? Stomach trouble?
> >
> > I completely missed raunchy's irony about the Portuguese
> > song. (Sorry, raunchy!) But I don't have any problem
> > admitting it.
> >
> Thanks, Judy. I knew I could count on you for a welcome shot of
reality. I've sure had my fill of wandering in fantasy land with
stooopid today.
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Something along these lines.
> > >
> > > Good times.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1"
> > > lurkernomore20002000@ wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"
<raunchydog@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Yep, reading comprehension never was your strong suit,
Steve. It's
> > > why
> > > > > Ravi calls you a fucking retard and ask I you to get your
facts
> > > straight
> > > > > so you don't always sound like you don't know what you're
talking
> > > about.
> > > > > Here's the scoop: Ann uses "dancing" as a metaphor for the
part that
> > > > > everyone played in generating and perpetuating the group
dynamic of
> > > WTS.
> > > > > This is such an elementary lesson in the use of metaphor, that
I
> > > feel
> > > > > embarrassed for you that you didn't get it. Now, if you were
being
> > > > > honest, Steve, you would have cited a specific example of
giving a
> > > wide
> > > > > berth to my allies, rather than calling my integrity into
> > > > > question...again. Look to your own integrity when you make
unfounded
> > > > > allegations and for goodness sake, start writing as if you're
not in
> > > a
> > > > > chronic fog of confusion.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yea, I missed it Raunchy. I guess sometimes that happens when
you
> > > read
> > > > > something too quickly. Sort of like when Robin posted the
beautiful
> > > > > video of the two Brazillian singers doing the duet. I felt
sorry
> > > that
> > > > > you could be so clueless as to the intent of the video. As I
recall
> > > > > Judy had to enlighten you on that one.
> > > >
> > > > Oh the bones, the bones, the tired old bones that Steve feels
> > > compelled to dig up for justice, truth and the American way...and
wrong
> > > bones again at that. I did your homework for you and found the
video and
> > > thread you're referring to, in which I said:
> > > >
> > > > "Robin, why did you post this video? I don't understand Spanish,
so I
> > > don't get it. Maybe Share does."
> > > >
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/321624
> > > >
> > > > In fact I did get the video and Robin's reason for posting it.
Robin
> > > gave several reasons why he posted the video but this one in
particular
> > > is why I responded to his posting of the video:
> > > >
> > > > "Share does not appear to know how to interact off of the cues
given
> > > to her by the other person: the synchrony and interactive
unification of
> > > these two singers seemed to offer a lesson in how to use another
human
> > > being to be inspired what to say, write, or sing next."
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps it was a poor use of irony on my part to convey that I
agreed
> > > with Robin that Share doesn't read cues from others very
well...and
> > > neither do you for that matter. Judy didn't understand why I wrote
what
> > > I wrote and I didn't bother to correct her.
> > > >
> > > > > Or perhaps the fact that you may
> > > > > have been the last person to realize that Osama Bin Laden was
> > > > > killed by
> > > > > US troops. Or maybe you still aren't dialed into that yet.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > You missed it Steve. I owned up to my penchant for conspiracies
and
> > > the Bin Laden conspiracy in particular with Judy, long ago.
> > > >
> > > > > I don't care to once again bring up the issue of your lack of
> > > > > credibility. As I've said before, the only one who has
sometimes
> > > been so
> > > >
> > > > If anyone lacks credibility around here, Steve...it's you.
> > > >
> > > > > one sided about issues is Sal. Perhaps that is why you have
such
> > > > > animosity towards her. You know how that works, right?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > In case you hadn't noticed Sal hasn't posted anything on FFLife
in a
> > > long time. The last time her name came up was because she had
posted a
> > > shitty email to Emily. Go ahead...defend Sal over that one...it
should
> > > be fun to watch.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to