--- In [email protected], "feste37" <feste37@...> wrote: > > Yeah, dog should be ashamed of herself. She meditates in the dome with Share > every day. She knows who Share is -- I mean the actual, physical person -- > and yet apparently feels it is OK to make these wild and scurrilous > accusations against her. >
Dog does not meditate in the dome everyday. Dog meditates at home most days. Dog, rightly or wrongly, has OPINIONS just as you have OPINIONS about Dog. Woof. > --- In [email protected], "seventhray1" <lurkernomore20002000@> > wrote: > > > > > > Jees Share, > > > > What a shame you had to bring all this up. Certainly it proves your > > point. Kinda of ends of the discussion. I hope the others will now > > finally just shut up about it. But Raunchy brought it upon herself with > > her crazy accusations. > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@> > > wrote: > > > > > > hey FFL I've avoided bringing this up because to do so felt right. > > But now Raunchy has accused me of stalking. And more importantly, Robin > > has allowed that accusation to stand. Here are two cyber events I > > remember. You all can decide if there was stalking. And if so, who > > actually did the stalking. > > > > > > > > > The first upset between me and Robin began on Sept 6. On Sept 9 Judy > > barged in. Some time later, I only remember that it was a Monday, Robin > > announced to me online that he had nothing further to say about it all. > > He included an email that he had sent to me offline the night before. > > The following Friday he posted out. It seemed to be intentional. The > > very next day, Saturday, he contacted me offline continuing the upset. > > Even though on the previous Monday he had said online that he had > > nothing further to say about it. And 2 or 3 days later he sent me his > > photo THOUGH I HAD NEVER OFFLINE NOR ONLINE REQUESTED IT. Ok, I'm not > > calling this stalking, but it's clear to me that Robin was the one who > > was continuing contact. And changing it somehow with the addition of > > the unrequested photo. > > > > > > > > > The second cyber event added the element of, well again you all > > decide. Robin again emailed me offline after ending online > > communication. It was a day when I had been out and about all day so I > > received all three emails at the same time. In the first email he said > > that he was considering if he should post all our offline communication > > onto FFL. My immediate thought was, why? For what purpose? But there > > also seemed to be a subtle threat especially in light of the second > > email. See next paragraph. A threat which btw was nonetheless > > ineffective because the most personal info I had shared with Robin > > offline was about having no contact with my Mom for 2 1/2 years after > > she left my Dad when I was 4. BTW, I know this happened to help me pay > > off my karmic debt. > > > > > > > > > Anyway, Robin's second email was a terse 2 liner saying that I had til > > 11 pm that night to give me my answer about whether or not he should > > post our offline emails. The third email contained in the Subject line: > > I have decided against it. > > > > > > > > > Again, I'm not calling this stalking. But it demonstrates that it was > > Robin, not me who continued communication between us. > > > > > >
