Dear Sharester, this is Emily's 44th post.  Will you make sure she doesn't post 
out?  She does like to have the last word - we must cure her of that.  I, 
Emilina have been dispatched to attend to your post, despite the very, very, 
fabulous ways that it has already been attended to.  I hope your sense of humor 
is intact.  Emily is still in a recuperative state, reclining on her blue 
velvet chaise lounge.  I have dispensed with the chamomile tea, however, and am 
giving her brandy with lemon.  Good for the throat, is what her healer tells 
her.  

RE: "What's a good synonym for the word point do you think?"

How about "spike"?  As in "that's a good spike!"  

RE: Anyway, what was the question, what was the question...oh, yes wts.  
Completely healed.  November 11th.  Yes or no.  Asterisks.  Honey.

Question *YOU* posed and I posed back to you as:  "Do you think there has been 
complete healing of wts since November 11th?" Yes or No.

YOUR ANSWER:  

"You know, Ravi did not sound like himself at all today.  I did wonder if HE 
might be completely healed.  Either that or he has been totally assimilated by 
the BORG.  Buttery Omnivorous Robin Group.

HMMMM, let me see if I can figure this out for poor Emily......  Ravi.  Healed. 
 Assimilated.  BORG.  Yes, I get it.....yes, he has.  With Ravi, Sheister, the 
number 7 in Robin's group (BORG, wts, who cares?) has been achieved (you did 
throw Feste in there too, remember?)  Is 7 a magic number?  Yes or No?  
(Whoops, I should have referred to you as Sharester..sorry...I, Emilina have a 
personal definition of "sheister", but I will keep it to myself).  

So, still, "has there been a complete healing of wts since November 11th?"
Which is perfect just as it is.  Warts and all.  As is wts.  As is FFL High 
School football lunch table in the cafeteria gang."

Is this the long-awaited answer?  I think this is a *YES* (emphasis added).  I 
see you included reference to the high school football team scenario.  Good on 
ya.  I didn't want to confuse the issue originally, but yes, I see your spike 
here, I do.  Alright, Sharester, we are getting somewhere.  I have a *YES*.  
Yeah!! Rah Rah Ravi!! (I am a cheerleader - you were right about that - don't 
you love it when your right?")

PS  Your answer is in the first two sentences just above.  You did say I could 
answer with more than yes or no.  Remember?  

P.S.S.  Not to the above question, but to a prior one, yes I did.  *BLESSINGS* 
and I say that with a smile as wide as Jim Carey's and that passive-aggressive 
guy, what's his name?  Compassionately, Emilina



________________________________
From: seventhray1 <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 2:00 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: to Emily part 2



Emily, remember when you derived so much joy from the Judy/Robin exchange a 
long time back.  I couldn't relate.  But the humor in that exchange was so 
evident to you.  

I hope you can appreciate the marvelous humor Share is employing here.  

Kudos Share!

--- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote:
>
> EmilyBoo what does it mean when someone puts a word between asterisks?  I've 
> been wondering this for a long time but it hasn't seemed truly pertinent til 
> now.  And it sounds like you feel entitled to a simple yes or no answer 
> because you have spent SO many posts on me this week.  OTOH, you say that I 
> am healing your karma.  See how it all balances out all by itself (-:
> 
> BTW, speaking of stress, don't listen to those TM teachers!  You can be 
> totally unstressing and still be making a valid point.  Like when they fed 
> us millet at every meal.  Of course people were unstressing on that!  Only 
> a totally zorbed out person wouldn't!  The point is, the unstressors were 
> making a very valid, uh, point.  What's a good synonym for the word point do 
> you think?
> 
> 
> Anyway, what was the question, what was the question...oh, yes wts.  
> Completely healed.  November 11th.  Yes or no.  Asterisks.  Honey.
> 
> You know, Ravi did not sound like himself at all today.  I did wonder if HE 
> might be completely healed.  Either that or he has been totally assimilated 
> by the BORG.  Buttery Omnivorous Robin Group.
> 
> Which is perfect just as it is.  Warts and all.  As is wts.  As is FFL 
> High School football lunch table in the cafeteria gang.
> 
> PS  Your answer is in the first two sentences just above.  You did say I 
> could answer with more than yes or no.  Remember?
> 
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: emilymae.reyn emilymae.reyn@...
> To: [email protected] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:17 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: to Emily part 2
> 
> 
>   
> Sharester, "Do you think there has been complete healing of wts since 
> November 11th?"  Yes or No.  It is *your* question, honey.  No rabbit hole, 
> just a simple yes or no will do for me.  Now, I have spent many posts this 
> week on you - you are healing my karma.  I must back off of my propensity to 
> comment or I will post out again, and I'm not in the mood to do that this 
> week.  I wish you a stress-free day.
> 
> --- In [email protected], Share Long sharelong60@ wrote:
> >
> > There was a post from wts via Ravi this morning!  So based on that, I'd 
> > say wts is alive and kicking.  Or maybe zorbing.  Anyway, something 
> > relevant:  when the karma is finished, the cure appears.  Another 
> > version:  when the karma is finished, the healer appears.  Came to mind 
> > as I've been thinking about complete healing.  Which seems related to your 
> > wts questions to me.  It seems that another way to ask those wts questions 
> > is:  do I think there has been complete healing of wts since Nov 11.  
> > Uhoh, still a rabbit hole as Richard would say.  Still FFL waters that can 
> > be muddied way too quickly.  Anyway, maybe someone is completely healed.  
> > Time will tell.
> > 
> > Oh, I didn't think you were contesting anything I said.  And thanks, I got 
> > it about your not disagreeing with Judy or Raunchy.  And yes, there's 
> > always another way to look at everything.
> >
>

   

Reply via email to