http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yH97lImrr0Q
________________________________ From: Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.r...@gmail.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 6:59:46 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Cyberstalker Trainees (Turq's Occult Theory Of What Motivates Cyberstalkers) On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Emily Reyn <emilymae.r...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >WTF?....LOL....(to channel the traveling RC - same initials as RC - this must >be a sign). Dear Em - traveling RC here - one hell of a channeling :-) but what do you mean by "same initials as RC"? - what am I missing? > > >>________________________________ >> From: Bob Price <bobpri...@yahoo.com> >>To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> >>Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 11:21 AM >>Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Cyberstalker Trainees (Turq's Occult Theory Of >>What Motivates Cyberstalkers) >> >> >> >> >>Barry, >> >>You must know how hurtful is was for you to neglect to >>include me on your list, you of all people know how hard I've worked to be >>close to you; it was a bit of a challenge for me, but I gave it shot, and it >>appears 89% of my posts have been about you (unfortunately, I tried the same >>search with Robin and hit 96%); in any event, with your help, I'm going to >>work >>harder in 2013 to be the kind of person you think I am. >> >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lafu642uq8Q >> >>________________________________ >>From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com> >>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >>Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 2:42:48 AM >>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cyberstalker Trainees (Turq's Occult Theory Of What >>Motivates Cyberstalkers) >> >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: >>> >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote: >>> > >>> > I can remember when you [Judy] used to work out what time >>> > Barry made his first post of the day, you'd then triumphantly >>> > post this fact as though it proved some point. Dead creepy >>> > behaviour, kind of worrying you don't have the self-awareness >>> > to realise it. Maybe Carol shouldn't take your analyses at >>> > face value? >>> >>> Hmmmmmmm...besides the tracking of what time I get up >>> in the morning, what *else* might indicate that Judy is >>> a...uh...bit of a cyberstalker? >>> >>> Let's see... >>> >>> Oh, I've got it. In her 7.7 years on Fairfield Life, >>> Judy has made around 22,600 posts, an average of over >>> eight posts a day. >>> >>> Of those posts, the number that contain either "Barry" >>> OR "Turq" OR "TurquoiseB," meaning that she was either >>> talking about me or replying to something I posted or >>> replying to something that someone else posted about >>> me was 7,626 posts. >>> >>> That means that she's spent 33.74% of her entire history >>> of posts on FFL obsessing about me. >>> >>> Nope...certainly no evidence of stalking there, eh? :-) >> >>Speaking of Fun With Statistics :-), here are some >>about a few of Judy's "trainees" in her ongoing course, >>called How To Become An Obsessed Cyberstalker. >> >>So far, Jim (doctordumbass) is winning, but Ann is >>a close second. The first number is the total number >>of posts they've made to FFL, at least under their >>current ID. The second is the number of those posts >>that contain "Barry" OR "Turq" OR "TurquoiseB." The >>third number is the percentage of their overall posts >>that seem a tad...uh...obsessed (or at the very least >>overfocused) on Barry, just as their trainer intended >>them to be: >> >>Jim -- 330 posts / 181 mention me -- 54.8% >>Ann -- 1172 posts / 586 mention me -- 50% >>Ravi -- 2276 posts / 907 mention me -- 39.8% >>Emily -- 1805 posts / 683 mention me -- 37.8% >>Raunchy -- 3847 posts / 909 mention me -- 23.6% >> >> >> >> >>
