> > Barry, just to let you know, I clearly appreciate your input > > on this, WHILE IT WAS GOING ON, so as I perceive this post > > being directed to me, I feel your concern in a very positive > > way. > > authfriend: > As I said, navashok is lacking in integrity, to put it mildly. > > What the article Barry posted was describing had nothing to > do with anything that was going on or ever *has* gone on on > FFL. Barry knows that, navashok knows that. > > Commenting negatively on something someone said in a post on > an Internet forum is not "stalking" by any honest definition. > If it were, almost all of us here would be "stalkers," Barry > and navashok most definitely included. > > The motivation for calling this "stalking" is very simple: > It's an attempt at revenge by Barry and nashoka on those > who make negative comments on their posts because they are > unable to refute the comments, and when they instigate > arguments in an attempt to do so, they are unable to "win." > > They can't hold their own, so they portray themselves as > victims. And they bring nothing but dishonor on themselves > by doing so--especially since they themselves are far more > guilty of the behavior they complain about than the folks > they claim are victimizing them. > > Neither of them will even try to address what I just said, > because they know it's accurate. > It's open season on anyone who cross-posts FFL to Usenet. LoL!
P.S. Is this even legal? Subject: THINGS TMers BELIEVE, Volume II (6 February 2007) Author: Uncle Tantra Forum: alt.meditation.transcendental Date: March 6, 2007 http://tinyurl.com/aplehry
