Lovely poem, brilliant video....wow...or "oh dear, oh dear, oh dear, my dear".  
What lines (I may get a few of these wrong)..."I am a bilingual illiterate."  
"I only get turned on by Jewish cowboys." "I wrote the song myself, but I can't 
read music, so I don't know what it says."  "I'm going there, but I like it 
here, wherever it is." "Stop the car, I'm getting out, you are no longer here." 
 



>________________________________
> From: Bob Price <[email protected]>
>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 4:45 PM
>Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best article on cyberstalking I've read in 
>quite some while
> 
>
>  
>Obba,
>
>Any man able to fog a mirror would know only a city as great as Manhattan 
>could contain
>a woman of your qualities; TB is still upset about getting caught mood making 
>while
>he was doing PUJA, if he had any class, he'd offer to buy you a new pair of 
>shoes:
>
>http://pinterest.com/priscill/outrageous-shoes/
>
>“Love looks not with the
>eyes, but with the mind,
>And therefore is winged Cupid
>painted blind.” 
>
>-A Midsummer Night's Dream.
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WX2wybAIAHU
>
>________________________________
>From: obbajeeba [email protected]>
>To: [email protected] 
>Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 4:41:18 PM
>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best article on cyberstalking I've read in quite 
>some while
>
>Lipstick does not remove a dick.
>
>Unless the bitch licks with a strap on? 
>
>(last I read, Barry appears to still be a man, regardless the shade he glamors 
>his lips with.)
>LOL
>
>--- In [email protected], doctordumbass@...  wrote:
>>
>> If he had the lipstick on, wouldn't the roles be reversed, wrt the dog? I 
>> dunno -- Once you threw cross dressing and/or gender bending into the mix, 
>> it became weirder than a david lynch movie.
>> 
>> --- In [email protected], obbajeeba  wrote:
>> >
>> > Turq,
>> > In a sexy way, I thought you were pretty smart, cute, etc.
>> > Now, it is like I caught you putting lipstick on and fucking the dog. 
>> > hahaha. 
>> > Ex-Patiot 
>> > http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/05/why-the-ex-patriot-act-is-a-creepy-law/257368/
>> > 
>> > Number two: I do not live in Fairfield. Never have, never will.
>> > 
>> > Number three: The "Jobs"  or employers you mentioned. I would never apply 
>> > for, and if I was hired, it would be from headhunters begging me to come 
>> > and work for their clients. :)
>> > 
>> > Social security will not exist by the time I get to "have it." 
>> > 
>> > Dear, you could send more private emails to me and we can share pictures, 
>> > then you won't say nothin.   LOL
>> > 
>> > Peace handsome
>> > 
>> > -Obba
>> > 
>> > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb  wrote:
>> > >
>> > > --- In [email protected], obbajeeba  wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > 
>> > > > Barry, I mean, Turq. No one cyberstalks on FFL.
>> > > > It is fair exchange of knowledge and ignorance. 
>> > > > Knowledge, by which you ignore and play accusation games. 
>> > > > Judy is not a cyberstalker. You would fall in a minor 
>> > > > sort of that category by trying to claim any statements 
>> > > > on this board are attempting to derail a person's "cyber 
>> > > > history," for future employer's eyes. hahaha. Pointing 
>> > > > fingers all day long, month after month, year after year, 
>> > > > yawn, would bore any "employer." Any "employer," who 
>> > > > would base hiring on any of these posts would be someone, 
>> > > > no one should work for!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  LOL. What grant 
>> > > > department did they earn their business dollars???? LOL. 
>> > > > Any entrepreneur who develops their own company without 
>> > > > outside governmental aid, would see right past all the 
>> > > > bullshit. Any others, are not worthy the tax dollar 
>> > > > wasted supporting their authority? lol.
>> > > 
>> > > I understand now why you live in Fairfield. You would
>> > > never be able to survive in the real world. In recent
>> > > studies, 80% of all employers surveyed said that they
>> > > perform Internet background searches on all potential
>> > > employees, examining their posts on Google, Facebook,
>> > > Yahoo, Twitter, etc. Many government jobs *require*
>> > > that such a search be performed. 
>> > > 
>> > > > Turq, one day there may be a requirement, to collect your 
>> > > > social security, you have to be in living within the 50 
>> > > > US States, if you post on the internet on forums, in 
>> > > > case we are all funding terrorists living abroad as 
>> > > > ex patriots!!!!!!!!!!!! :) Just saying, dear. Love you. OXO 
>> > > 
>> > > Unlike you, I will never need to rely on American Social
>> > > Security. Nor, hopefully, ever need to live in your third 
>> > > world bankrupt nation again. :-)
>> > > 
>> > > BTW, the word is expatriate, not "ex patriot." I have 
>> > > never been a patriot, and would sooner die than be 
>> > > considered one. 
>> > > 
>> > > "If I had to choose between betraying my friend or my 
>> > > country, I hope I'd have the guts to betray my country."
>> > > - E.M. Forster
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb  wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --- In [email protected], "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"  
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend"  wrote:
>> > > > > > > They can't hold their own, so they portray themselves as
>> > > > > > > victims. And they bring nothing but dishonor on themselves
>> > > > > > > by doing so--especially since they themselves are far more
>> > > > > > > guilty of the behavior they complain about than the folks
>> > > > > > > they claim are victimizing them.
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > I am not so sure about that. I searched for the word victim 
>> > > > > > and victimized in Barry's posts to see how he applied the 
>> > > > > > word to himself, and he does not seem to have used the word 
>> > > > > > in reference to himself. There were some 400+ references to 
>> > > > > > the word 'victim' and some 41 for the word 'victimize'. As 
>> > > > > > I have a limited time, I chose the word 'victimized' and 
>> > > > > > read every paragraph where he used the word in an original 
>> > > > > > post. This provides a reasonable sample.
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > In not one case does he refer to himself as having been 
>> > > > > > victimized. I really do not think he thinks of himself 
>> > > > > > that way. 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > He does not. Thinking of the people one stalks AS 
>> > > > > victims is something that stalkers do. Their fantasies
>> > > > > revolve around how strongly they are affecting the
>> > > > > people they hate. 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > In my considered opinion, the best thing one can do
>> > > > > when faced with an Internet stalker is to allow them
>> > > > > to fantasize about how strongly they are affecting 
>> > > > > you (something they would do anyway), while not allow-
>> > > > > ing anything they say to affect you at all. Drives 
>> > > > > them crazy. :-)
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > The other thing it is important to know about stalkers
>> > > > > is what the "end point" or "goal" of their game plan
>> > > > > is. That is, put very simply, to get you to respond 
>> > > > > to them one-to-one so that in their diseased minds 
>> > > > > they can have a Robin-like "confrontation" with you. 
>> > > > > It *doesn't matter* what you say when replying to them.
>> > > > > They already creamed their pants the moment you replied.
>> > > > > So don't. It's meaner.  :-)
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>    
>
> 
>
>

Reply via email to