--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > > > > > > > For some reason, this reminds me of a story I heard from > > > > what I think of as a reliable source: once on a course > > > > someone asked Maharishi if it's true that an enlightened > > > > man can just look at a person and pop them into enlightenment. > > > > Maharishi silently nodded his head. Well, Maharishi, said > > > > the guy, why don't you just look at us and pop us into > > > > enlightenment. Long pause. "Because it would knock your > > > > sox off," replied Maharishi. > > > > > > I was there. What Maharishi said was "it would instantly > > > burn you up" > > > > And you actually *believed* this horseshit? Either of you? > > > > At least now we know why Nabby is so gullible that he > > still believes in Benjamin Creme, who has been telling > > suckers like Nabby that his "savior" Maitreya is due > > to appear Any Day Now for over 54 years. He's still > > a "no show." > > > HaHa, ofcourse He is for you who are blind, deluded and dull. Not so much for > tens and thousands of others who have seen Him with their own eyes :-) > What I read somewhere recently is (in the context of the 9 Ashoks), that Osho actually believed that Krishnamurti, who renounced the role of Maitreya, should have accepted this role, that it was a mistake of him not to do so.
Krishnamurti in turn had said, that if the Maitreya was there, he would just exactly tell to the people what Krishnamurti said.
