Old Buck, I've met you in person at the health food store, remember? Based on those Old Buck sightings I'd say you could give those young bucks a run for their money (-:
But I'm with your about dissertations. Not fun! Anyway, better one's own dharma. The dharma of another brings danger. Right? Have fun with all your spring time tasks. ________________________________ From: Buck <dhamiltony...@yahoo.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 6:24 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Graphing Spiritual Leadership --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > Maybe that PhD topic is for you, Buck? Hey thanks for the article on Kepler. > Very interesting. > > PhD? Ha, Thanks for the support but no, not me. It will take some young buck academic who looks at it as their scholarly work. We all living know where the story is and can certainly point researchers in the right direction. That is going on. I enjoy that work. But I am too old now to learn to write in the way of The Chicago Manual of Style, 15th edition. That will take a younger person. Unless I partner with with a professional writer like Authfriend or Turqb here. Life is too short though. I got horses to train and oats to sow this next month. Winter on the internet is about over. -Old Buck > > > ________________________________ > From: Buck > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 7:48 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Graphing Spiritual Leadership > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > It seems most everyone here in Fairfield has developed a graph somewhat > > like this that they work off of from their own experience in sorting > > [reconciling] the [moral] spiritual dissonance they've seen. > > > > > That, how they've reconciled their conscience, in itself would make an > interesting survey. I'm telling ya, there is a PhD thesis in this here for > someone. > > > > It is relatively helpful in looking at this holy subject to graph > > > comparatively the Saintly or Holy ones in a Distribution by Graphing > > > their Saintly Distribution as data pairs on a Cartesian x-y axis. > > > > > > Graphing, > > > > > > For instance take: > > > 1 Spiritual Transformative Impact On the Vertical axis. > > > 2 The type of the holy person relatively on the horizontal axis. > > > > > > 1 Vertical: > > > > > > Holy > > > > > > Moral > > > > > > [Transforming Impact] > > > > > > Immoral > > > > > > Narcissistic > > > > > > 2 Horizontal: Avatar-Saintly, Satguru, guru, spiritual teacher, leader, > > > lecturer, author,,, reformer, etc... > > > > > > > > > Then simply consider someone and place them in the graph. > > > > > > A nice spiritually inclined academic like Phil Goldberg might be > > > somewhere around the moral-author turning to moral-lecturer on the graph. > > > Mother Meera, Holy Avatar-Saintly. Likewise Ammachi relatively. > > > Adyashanti somewhere around Moral-spiritual teacher. Mother Teresa, > > > Holy-Saintly Moral-spiritual teacher. Joe Stalin or Chairman Mao, > > > Narcissistic-leaders low down and over towards the right on the graph. > > > It's all relative and some people move on the graph in time. It's a > > > flexible tool © to use to see the holy or less so this way. The > > > Maharaja? Vivekanda? Different Popes? Have fun. > > > -Buck > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, srijau@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > great guy but for those easily confused,its not Maharishi > > > > > > Mahesh Yogi nor Maharaja Adhiraja Rajaram! > > > > > > > > > > Om, let's see: guru spiritual teachers, authors, lecturers; > > > > > but saints? How do YOU see, Maharaj? A spiritual teacher? > > > > > A folk with a transformative field effect [darshan]? Saintly? > > > > > Holy? Graceful? A Saint? Sat Guru? Doing spiritual work as > > > > > an empathetic and humanitarian in a nature of spiritual > > > > > character on earth? > > > > > > > > > > ie., Wiki: Satguru (Sanskrit: सदगुरू) does not merely mean > > > > > true guru. The term is distinguished from other forms of > > > > > gurus, such as musical instructors, scriptural teachers, > > > > > parents, and so on. The satguru is a title given specifically > > > > > only to an enlightened rishi/sant whose life's purpose is to > > > > > guide...the summation of which is the realization of > > > > > the Self through realization of God [the Unified Field], who > > > > > is omnipresent. A Satguru has some special characteristics > > > > > that are not found in any other types of Spiritual Guru." > > > > > > > > "People use the word 'guru' because 'charlatan' is so hard > > > > to spell." -- Peter Drucker > > > > > > >
