--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... <no_reply@...> wrote: > > "people who praise her for this outburst would speak of being > sattvic as an ideal for channeling." > > I heard my name and thought I would respond.:-) > > I was really happy to see a side of obbajeeba I had not seen before - damned > good creative writing too! > > First, I do not channel. I don't know what that is, or how to do it. Sounds > stupid. My senses are refined from practice of the TMSP. Its not magic or > intent. It just happens - hop on the bicycle often enough and you learn to > ride. > > Next, your attention is very selective.
Not only my attention is selective, but, please note that, what I comment on is with discrimination. That is to say, I NEVER approved him using the word cunt. In fact, as a foreigner, it is difficult for me to exactly gauge the exact impact and application of English words. AND: I clearly can approve things he says, but differ in my opinion about many other things, or the way he says things. But you and others explicitly praised Obba for exactly this diatribe, and even try to copy her, as seen below. >From that, and many other things you say, and the way you say it, I make my >personal evaluation of you, and it just doesn't cut it, sorry. > Barry is the only person on here who enjoys calling women cunts. If you would > like to initiate your moral outrage, by first acknowledging that, I may > listen. But making a big deal out of a spot on reference to his wanking and > drawing your anger from that, makes me picture you, too, with your trousers > around your ankles. Please remember to wash your hands afterwards.:-) > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > especially hilarious because you are pretty light-hearted on > > > > > here, 'til now, and Barry, like he always does, thought he > > > > > had found an easy mark, a dumping ground for his general > > > > > dis-ease. > > > > > > > > Not for the first time, either. Obba brings out the > > > > very worst of his sadistic tendencies. > > > > > > > > I highly recommend the commentary by Robin on one of > > > > Barry's outbursts of sadism directed at Obba January > > > > before last: > > > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301577 > > > > > > > > Fans of Robin's takedowns will also enjoy two follow-up > > > > posts of his responding to Barry's impotent attempts to > > > > brush off the first one: > > > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301596 > > > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301675 > > > > > > > > > Ahem. Just back in from a fun day in Amsterdam. Two points: > > > > > > 1. "I might also point out that searching the Web for information > > > to use against somebody is standard cyberstalking behavior." > > > - Judy Stein, 11 February 2013 :-) > > > > > > 2. "outbursts of sadism?" ALL that I said about obba, based > > > on her first dumbass overreaction to the article Alex posted, > > > was that she was an idiot and ignorant, and that based on > > > that I could certainly understand why none of the guys she > > > has flirted with here were interested in her. That's it. > > > In contrast, THIS is what she posted in reply, going batshit > > > crazy and claiming that I'd "snipped" (which I didn't). I > > > don't see the self-defined cyberstalker above pointing THAT > > > out to anyone. Crazy women of a feather flock together. :-) > > > > > > > Precisely why you took the time to snip and cut what this > > > > post was in response too, and why you have much free time > > > > to troll on FFL. Your crusty undies are showing, from the > > > > shadow in the corner of the room, only lit by your laptop > > > > LED screen, and your perverted mind makes clear your real > > > > interest here, is to stroke your member and sip your drink > > > > to an imaginary friend, you call intellectual soft porn, > > > > waiting for the next gala to parade with your favorite > > > > movie stars. Ahh, as the mangy castrated bull stands in > > > > the field watching the real males hump their way to > > > > offspring, something your squirt can only wish for > > > > in the puddle of yellow spill below your belly. Tinkling > > > > delight of your urine sooth, Turq thinks, "Who's wife can > > > > I best beat off too, from this plastic keyboard orgasm > > > > happening in front of me and I assume my penis is erect > > > > for you oh cherished one." > > > > Flirting? Flirting is your "imagination," for if this was > > > > the case, the visual verbiage would lay in private message > > > > as you so humbly write and respond to. > > > > No, wait, the Turq knows when one is flirting and how can > > > > it be the most ignorant would come like the Ganges River > > > > and what single man with a working firm, wood, avoid what > > > > nature? Cleanse yourself, bathe in the waters of real > > > > women. > > > > Turq, back to your movie fantasy of women above cunt status, > > > > which is why you have never had a lasting relationship with > > > > any woman in your whole life, including your Mother who was > > > > glad to see you move away, that spurt your father left > > > > behind, her nightmare result, she knew she had to raise you > > > > to never reproduce. Window shopping in Amsterdam, need I > > > > say anymore? > > > > > I can't help, but I find this type of quasi pornographic pseudo humor > > disgusting. I don't say this just to support Barry, it's simply against my > > good taste. It's about the same type of 'joke' Raunchy engages in > > frequently, I just think it's kind of adolescent behavior, tasteless, not > > funny at all. What I find curious is, that people who praise her for this > > outburst would speak of being sattvic as an ideal for channeling.Sorry, I > > can't get this together, the way people post here in their own words, or > > what type of posts they support, and then claiming being Sattvic would help > > prevent the dangers of channeling. One has to ask oneself, if one obviously > > fails in discrimination on this gross level of existence, like the case of > > Robin clearly shows, how they could have the right discrimination on the > > more subtle astral levels. > > > > All those, who don't know what I am talking about should read the final > > chapter of the book CULT, the one before the epilogue. How could you cite a > > master manipulator, as this was a kind of authority in the field of human > > behavior? A person who once declared the Maharishi to be the Anti-Christ, > > yes I know he changed his opinion (opinion! not state of mind, but then he > > believes God died in 1945). Anyway, those who lack an essential sense of > > discrimination, an obvious lack of groundedness will have a hard time in > > the astral sphere, me thinks. > > >
