--- In [email protected], "Cliff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It allows people to be employed who won't have ANY job if high minimum- > wage guidelines are enforced. This will be particularly helpful in getting > teenagers or early-20s people who have little skills back to at least some > useful work. >
No teenagers or low-skill workers are going to be involved in rebuilding a disaster-area. You need your very best to handle the demands. I mean, they're going to be buildingin a contaminated swamp where living quarters will likely be miles from theworksite. you don't do OJT in emergency conditions. > I think it's a great move, and I believe I understand the economics behind > it. Is it possible that you oppose it simply because Bush proposed it? Is it possible you've missed that this is a disaster relief and rebuilding effort, not a $500 million pork-bridge in Alaska? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
