As for compatability, that totally depends on how the other person feels about barnacle comments ho ho.
________________________________ From: Emily Reyn <emilymae.r...@yahoo.com> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 7:52 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi Ravi, you just made my evening. So funny, you are. Share, did you find this funny? Is there hope that the equivalent of a "wee dram" of compatibility exists between the two of you? >________________________________ > From: Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.r...@gmail.com> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 4:11 PM >Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi > > > >"And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, >resemblance to me is imaginary" > > >Oh no - not that Ravi Yogi - I loved him once and got burned. He represents >something unknown, mysterious, dangerous, he's walking on razor's edge, he >will go down and take me down as well. I'm vulnerable and don't want to be >harmed - no matter if he changes names, shows me how he leads as normal life >as any - he is trouble. There's great safety in numbers, in the cult - haven't >you read the Guru Gita - the Guru is stable, predictable, consistent, poses no >threat, challenge to me and will lead me across. No thank you, Ravi Yogi's >crazy - not again, never. > >On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.r...@gmail.com> >wrote: > >Dear Share, >> >> >>Yay you are awesome - with your persistence I can clearly see I am very >>prejudiced and hold lots and lots of grudges, as thick as 6 inches of snow on >>the Fairfield dome, against you. My samskaras are fucked up, my aura too >>dense, my chakras totally polluted , karma - a big rap sheet, reincarnation - >>destined to the nether world, the abode of evil Rakshasaas. >> >> >>I'm sick Share - have pity on me for god's sake. I'm just waiting for the >>ascended masters to haul my sorry ass into the age of Enlightenment, till >>then I keep posting all kinds of cool quotes, pictures from Gandhi, Teresa on >>my Facebook page. And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - >>any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary. >> >> >>Love, >>Ravi >> >>On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Share Long <sharelon...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >>> >>>Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing >>>with each other. They were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME >>>OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude towards >>>me. For example, your assuming I'd call my ex ex if it bothered him. You >>>also seem desperate to be negative about me when you leap on something >>>casual I say, like you did with what I said about Norman churches in FF. >>>Even Judy responded to you about that. Twice. That's when I realized how >>>desperate you are to see me in a negative way and that is why I have avoided >>>you. I'm not interested in dealing with your prejudices about me. >>> >>>Even today, you made fun of Mr. Leed for missing the humor of my post to >>>Buck this morning. But you missed it too, didn't you? When you said: >>>wouldn't a true sidha be able to walk to the Dome, etc. Again, this is just >>>you seeing me and writing about me in a negative way. >>> >>>By the way, I noticed you didn't criticize Steve for taking up for you >>>recently in Jan. No making fun of him for being a knight on a white horse >>>coming to the aid of a damsel in distress. Which is what you used to do >>>when he came to my defense. Remember? So it's ok when he comes to your >>>defense but not when he comes to mine? Why is that? >>> >>>I've accepted that we're not compatible and I'm happy to not interact with you. And you don't seem to enjoy what I have to say, even when it's to other posters. So I wonder why you have kept trying to start an interaction with me this year. Especially since it seems you've already come to a negative conclusion about me and or what's in my post. Which is your right of course. But generally I won't be participating in such. There are more enjoyable and or enriching exchanges to be had on FFL. >>> >>> >>> >>>to Judy: when I said Steve recently supported Ann, I was including January >>>2013. >>>I'm pretty sure I did not reply to Ann before your reply to feste. In any >>>case, I didn't BLAME her for not getting me. That's your spin on it. >>>I skimmed Steve's post to Ravi and missed the bit about Ravi Yogi whose name >>>I wouldn't have recognized anyway. >>>I was talking about turq being ganged up on, not me. >>> >>>I'm not willing to be vulnerable with people who are prejudiced and or >>>holding a grudge against me. >>> >>>You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and my posts. >>> >>>to Ravi: I wasn't thinking of you when I wrote my reply to Steve. Nor did >>>I at that time even know who Ravi Yogi is. Actually I skimmed Steve's post so didn't register his reference to Ravi Yogi at all. You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and what I post. However, as long as it sounds to me as if you're still prejudiced against me and or carrying a grudge, I will more than likely not reply to your posts. But I wish you and your family all the best in everything. >>> >>>________________________________ >>> From: Ann <awoelfleba...@yahoo.com> >>>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >>>Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:05 AM >>>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: (Ouch...) Alex--this is spam! to Ann >>> >>> >>> >>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: >>>> >>>> boy, Obbadohbba, did you ever! Get that wrong I mean. Anywho Annie I >>>> think you and I are working off our karma with each other very nicely >>> >>>I don't think I have any karma to 'work off with you' but we may be creating >>>some. >>> >>>. To celebrate I'm gonna reply to all your attempts to start >>>confrontations, er I mean conversations so far with me here in 2013: >>> >>>I get the impression that if I don't agree with you about something or ask >>>you a question you take it as a confrontation. Am I confronting you now? >>>Oops, and now because I just asked you a question? Oops and now? Oh dear, >>>this could turn into an endless loop of quest, er, I mean confrontations. >>>> >>>> My ex does not mind my calling him ex. He laughed when I asked him and >>>> said that it sounded like I had pushed one of your buttons. >>> >>>Well, since I am no one's 'ex' I don't have a button there to push. >>>> >>>> Of course I know women can be competitive. I played sports in grade >>>> school and high school. And I'm here on FFL (-: >>> >>>Oh, because your comment stated otherwise. Take a look at it again. Not >>>trying to say that you're wrong just that it looked like you were saying you >>>were glad you were a woman because it meant you didn't have to worry about >>>competing or being competitive. >>>> >>>> >>>> Judy thoroughly answered your confront, er comment about Norman churches >>>> in FF, thank you. >>> >>>I like the word "thoroughly" you used here to express what you felt was a >>>positive for you and a negative for me. >>>> >>>> John perfectly answered your confront, er comment about the resigning >>>> Pope, responsibility and planets, thank you. >>> >>>And "perfectly" here is an interesting observation. I will have to look at >>>that post again because I don't remember it. Have YOU ever answered me >>>thoroughly or perfectly do you think? >>>> >>>> Concerning my NVC comment about contributing to someone's emotion vs >>>> causing it, I'll refer you to their website since I know how much you >>>> enjoy visiting such. >>> >>>You don't need to, you already told me the juiciest part. >>> >>> But beware, if you post it here, turq might call you spammish. Is it my >>>imagination or is EVERYBODY confusing us for each other?! First turq, then >>>Obbadohbba. Who's next?! Nabby?! >>> >>>Yes, interesting. Probably because we are so much alike. >>>> >>>> >>>> Concerning my comment to Xeno about malignant diagnosis: I bet you don't >>>> understand the Vulcan mind meld either!  >>> >>>If it might indicate there is some sort of brain tumour in evidence in >>>someone then no, I am not familiar with it and it might scare me half to >>>death anyway. On the other hand, if it relates to some 60's TV show then I >>>could maybe do some research on the Vulcan mind meld and report back. >>>> >>>> PS I LOVE the little spam reference in Subject line. Nature organizes >>>> best (-: >>> >>>Is nature in charge of FFL post titles? Would this qualify as support of >>>nature? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > >
