--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson <mjackson74@...> wrote:
>
> On second thought, you are right Dr Dummy - I hereby announce that I 
> officially revoke everything I said about Marshy and TM and I am gonna 
> program my Ipod to play only that goddamn funny, funny Maharishi Vedic Honey 
> video over and over and over - I hope one day to wear the white (meaning 
> become a raja) Jai Guru Dr. Dumbass!!!

Hey MJ. I will throw my small thought into the mix here. I have read and 
appreciated much of what you have written of your experiences at MIU, within 
the various phases of your different roles within the Movement as a meditator, 
member of staff and all the other ways in which you participated. I especially 
enjoyed reading what you had to say a few months ago when you first started 
posting about your disappointment/disillusionment/disgruntlement with MMY and 
with many others in positions of power and authority within the TMM. Although I 
was a meditator for almost 20 years and graduated from MIU I have no hard 
feelings about my time there or the technique. However, this does not stop me 
from considering all that you have to say about your own, very different, 
experience. And it does not mean I don't respect and consider all that you have 
to say as far as I can do that without having gone through or seen what you did.

I am not sure how much further you can go with your unearthing of the slimier 
aspects of what has gone on within the movement and around MMY and even with 
MMY himself. I, for one, have a pretty clear picture of what you know and how 
you feel. Your audience has been reading what you have to say for weeks now and 
I am pretty sure we could, individually, write an essay on how MJ feels about 
MMY and the Movement and the practice of TM. What is happening now is that some 
are getting tired of reading, of being exposed to, what is starting to sound a 
little like a broken record. What you have to say isn't going anywhere past 
where it has been for a while now. It is evidently important to you to use this 
forum, and other places, as a sounding board for how you feel. But it seems as 
if you are having to defend your position a little harder now, that there is 
not the same empathy or support for your position. It seems you are starting to 
look like a man standing alone on a hilltop defending his patch of land to an 
ever-increasing number of those unsympathetic to your 'cause'. 

I am not saying that what you have to say is less valid than it was three 
months ago it is just that if you test the wind direction and the barometer it 
is telling you your audience here is not quite as receptive to your message as 
it once was. This is, of course, only my opinion. I respect your need to voice 
how you feel and admire your courage to do just that but I think I have gotten 
the message now.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: "doctordumbass@..." <doctordumbass@...>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 8:35 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] TM Critics on FFL - the blind "leading" the sighted
>  
> 
>   
> Just such a strange thing, that the fiercest critics of TM on here, are those 
> with no recent experience of the technique. Sure, they had their heyday - a 
> few decades ago. 
> 
> Now, looking back hazily on those times, they stand up as those to be 
> believed, the DEFINITIVE VOICES regarding the technique, its founder, and any 
> other pearls that spew forth. Its just so much tripe.
> 
> Being ordinarily skeptical, doubting stuff I am told, is second nature to me 
> - an excellent survival tool, imo. So I can appreciate airing doubts 
> about...anything. However, how long does it take to integrate something THAT 
> YOU NO LONGER PRACTICE into your life? Why the public fixation on something 
> that no longer has value to you?
> 
> Are you warning us? (how condescending)
> 
> Are you saving us? (how laughable)
> 
> Are you opening our eyes? (see above)
> 
> Why are you *devoting* your time and thought, to something you no longer do?
> 
> Color me Puzzled.
>


Reply via email to