--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" <awoelflebater@> wrote: > > > > > > Well, personally, I'll take number one, meditator or not > > > and number three looks like a mannequin. > > > > Since it looks like one could potentially mouseover the > > photos and see the captions listed below, I'll spoil the > > fun and reveal that none of the three are TM meditators. > > None are even women. All of them were created using CGI. > > > > Pretty amazing, eh? > > I thought they were mannequins, but I think I saw something > like it on the news a few months back about how movie > directors won't have to put up with stroppy actors once this > new technology gets perfected. Looks like they are almost there!
Meaning of course that artificial the women I saw were animated not mannequins, but they looked very like these idealised creations.
