--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "PaliGap" <compost1uk@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > If I may say something more esoteric here, for me Judy is still a young 
> > > > soul, despite of the age of her physical body. There will be always a 
> > > > conflict with older souls here, who draw from a wider field of 
> > > > experience and thinking, who have come a longer way, and that manifests 
> > > > usually early on in this life.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > If it wasn't a sad and arrogant statement from the above I'd say it will 
> > > qualify for: JOKE of week !
> > 
> > No, no, no. get it right Nabby. BOLLOCKS of the week. Jeez, talk
> > about "self-aggrandisement"...
> 
> 
> 
> With opponents like navashok, the neurotic ex-pat and the wannabe-negro who 
> thinks he's an artist, Judy hasn't much serious work to do these days.

Nabby, from my side, Judy doesn't need to have any 'serious work' at all with 
us, she should just leave us alone, relax and enjoy life. I have other things 
to do, than engage her in meaningless discussions, or be engaged by her. I'm 
actually very busy, so please relax, play with somebody else.

> > Then again, this is quite common in debate these days, no? You
> > don't just *disagree* with someone. You also wheel in some pseudo-
> > crappy theory about WHY they disagree with you. e.g. The wrong
> > bits of the brain "light up", or they are in "denial", etc etc.
> > It's a nice short cut to avoid dealing with the very messy 
> > nitty-gritty of logic, argument and evidence.
> > 
> > PaliGap's Thought-de-Jour:  Treat with great suspicion anyone
> > who uses the word "brain" when any perfectly serviceable English
> > word such as "me" or "mind" is available to do the job at hand. 
> > 
> > And also watch out for the word "epistemology". It does NOT mean
> > "how we justify belief" (Karl Popper would be rotating in his
> > grave at a rate of knots). It means the "theory of knowledge"
> > (as Emily correctly ascertained).
> > 
> > Just sayin'
> > 
> > BTW Is Virish (or whatever his name is) "guilty until proved
> > innocent"? I say this as someone who whilst once running a
> > small organisation, got accused of "sexual harrassment"
> > myself. It's not nice. In my case the biddy was a nutter, we
> > were not in the public eye, and it came to nothing. 
> > 
> > At least that's my story!
> >
>


Reply via email to