--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> I must admit a fondness for playing devil's advocate, to those playing 
> devil's advocate. Who doesn't love popping balloons? As for who is allowed to 
> post here, my intent is to express my perspective, more than shutting others 
> down - except Ravi, recently, who pissed me off. 
> 
> I like getting past the stale crap, and the sacred cows, and move things 
> along. I like a diversity of opinions here, and not just the tiresome rants 
> against all things TM, that we hear so often. It smacks too much of railing 
> against theism, imo, and has very little to do with seeing the world in a 
> different way. 180 degree turns in perspective are nothing special, and lack 
> any creativity.
> 
> There is an incurious and one-trick-pony aspect to much of what passes for 
> argument around here, with Barry and Curtis. Pick a straw man, beat him to 
> death, and if anyone objects, they are somehow deficient.
> 
> Has very little to do with the posted purpose of this forum. So when I can, 
> I'll point out the obvious and hope that creates some space for other voices 
> here. Is it altruism on my part? No way, just trying to keep things 
> interesting. 

Well I, for one, appreciate your contributions, your sense of humour, your 
spunk and who the hell cares if you're enlightened, schizophrenic, bipolar, 
have had a lobotomy, are Einstein incarnate or are Mr Ed? Frankly, I don't give 
a damn. You are who you are. You can call or think yourself whatever you like. 
Labels mean very little to me. Especially labels that are impossible to prove. 
Saying you are enlightened doesn't make you a laughing stock, it doesn't mean 
you have to be a genius, it doesn't mean you are a millionaire or better than 
anyone else and yet some here take such UMBRAGE at this small self-proclaimed 
factoid. 

And many here who hate this idea about you are the very ones who claim TM and 
anything else that smacks of cult or true belief is rubbish. You would think 
that those who have 'moved on' from these things wouldn't care one way or 
another since to them it is all a huge waste of time and all one big lie 
anyway. Obviously, those that are most vitriolic when it comes to you Doc, are 
those with some sort of past history or ax to grind. Since that was all before 
my time here I will just take you for what I see and say, "Carry on, wave your 
freak flag of enlightenment, it becomes you." And thanks for your contributions 
to FFL.
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > No problem Jim.  Speak your mind as you always do.  You feel you speak
> > with authority of an awakened person, and I don't have a problem with
> > that.  In many ways I find it refreshing.  I assume you were being
> > facitious in suggesting that Curtis and Barry, and who knows who else,
> > should be booted from the group.  But you said it anyway.  And for all I
> > know you meant it.  Who cares if you did.  Perhaps in your view, those
> > dissenting opinions are just too dangerous for others here.
> > 
> > I'd be tempted to say, that you'd think others might voice an objection
> > to nablusoss comments, but I know well what to expect in reply to that. 
> > I think his comments are pretty lame, and I put them in a different
> > category than Barry, for example, calling people  "cunts".
> > 
> > Call me a hypocrite for that.  But please don't ask me defend that
> > opinion.  That is reserved for those rare discussions here, where there
> > is a genuine back and forth, instead of jockeying for position to
> > deliver the next insult. Nothing against insults mind you.  But there
> > are well delivered insults and then there are those with no creativity,
> > just a mean spirited intent.
> > 
> > And yes, it is sort of funny to hear Judy declare such powers of
> > discrimination for herself, (and Robin of course), that they are able to
> > detect a certain deviousness that Curtis puts out, that is out of the
> > range of detection of your average Joe.
> > 
> > Wouldn't you just  love,  just love to put that claim to a panel of
> > experts.  Like it would make any difference.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Et tu, Steve?
> > >
> > > ...Cat's out of the bag - I have run up a pretty sizable tab on my
> > credit card, purchasing large tins of fine caviar for Alex, and improved
> > studio equipment for Rick, not to mention paying for several yagyas at
> > inflated Movement prices, to ensure that Curtis posted out last week,
> > AND the bylaws of FFL Inc. will be modified, to my liking. Takes fire to
> > fight fire!!
> > >
> > > No expense is too great to ensure that these forces of darkness do not
> > contaminate FFL - I am seriously contemplating taking out a second
> > mortgage, that the Good Fight escalate in earnest! Lobbying on the side
> > of the angels!! Are you with me, or against me buddy??
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I guess it speaks to the power of Curtis that he can incite such
> > hatred
> > > > such that Nabby feels he must ramp up the insult level until he can
> > get
> > > > his desired response, and that Jim feels that Curtis should not be
> > > > allowed to even post here, and that Curtis is so subtle in his
> > > > deviousness that only a very trained eye can spot it.
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > > > <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, FFL PostCount ffl.postcount@
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fairfield Life Post Counter
> > > > > > ===========================
> > > > > > Start Date (UTC): 03/09/13 00:00:00
> > > > > > End Date (UTC): 03/16/13 00:00:00
> > > > > > 724 messages as of (UTC) 03/15/13 23:45:32
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 52 curtisdeltablues
> > > > >
> > > > > CDBlues takes a cruise, while Michael Jack is welcome back.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to