Right that's acceptable dear Steve, your concerns well articulated and thank you for wishing a happy ending - whatever that means. That 16 years of working in offices, cubicles, 4 years of single life and a belief system I am eager to peddle is causing me to insult you here on FFL is a fiction of yours.
On Mar 19, 2013, at 2:54 PM, "seventhray27" <[email protected]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> > wrote: > > snip > > Very funny but try again. How does a giver become poor - doesn't add up > > dude. > > Don't think I said that dude. Your giving is well documented. But you > have chosen insults to be your main form of your interaction here. I admit, > you are good at it. And if that's where you want to hang your hat, they you > can be proud of your achievements. > > And really, I don't know how you stand down from that, and,-you know, relate > man to man, or man to woman. You're a specialist. A hired insulter from > the Bengal State. (don't know if it's true, but it sounded good) You're > Django, (and the "D" is silent) Wait, she got the girl in the end. > > Maybe your story will have a happy ending too. Lord knows it's had plenty of > fireworks! > > (where is that rascal anyway - LK?) > > > > > > > > On Mar 19, 2013, at 2:22 PM, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@... wrote: > > > > > Ah, comes now the great insulter, plying the skill he hones on those long > > > walks with Devi. > > > > > > > > > But always, I come to the same question. I mean, with your great > > > intellect, here you are, day after day, stuck on a cubicle farm, thinking > > > about how lonely you are and how you might be able to score a date. > > > > > > Of course, I was rooting for you on this last go around. But I knew it > > > was a lost cause, when after ten minutes you started in with the Ravi > > > Guru routine and told her how she wasting her time on meditation. Did you > > > notice how things changed at that point? > > > > > > I didn't think so, you were so busy talking. Talk, talk. Talk, talk, > > > talk. Nithyananda this, Nithydananday that, Satnam Sing this, Satnam > > > Sing that. > > > > > > Did you notice her eyes gloss over? Did you notice her foot tapping > > > nervously, and her frozen smile, broken only by an forced laugh at your > > > awkward attempt at humor? Oops, suddenly she got that text message and > > > had to leave. > > > > > > Hang in there Rav. Until you get a life, you can keep working the insult > > > angle. You need something to keep busy. (-: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Feeling the heat dear Steve..LOL. You probably think MJ is dumber than > > > > you - not that I disagree mind you. Anyway it's good to finally see > > > > someone after 3 years, threatening to usurp your position - I am loving > > > > it. I'm still rooting for you though, but remember MJ's from South > > > > Carolina - he's got the history, culture, genes on his side, so you > > > > need to be on the top of your game, tighten it up a bit, take it up a > > > > notch, insert any other favorite cliche of yours here. > > > > > > > > And yes, in case you were wondering, I do "love ya like brother". > > > > > > > > On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:39 PM, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > Michael, my friend, I am afraid you are losing it. Or is it.... "lost > > > > > it". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure. But listen, I have just the solution. This posting > > > > > stuff is obviously taking its toll. > > > > > > > > > > Take a break for a few days. Maybe until, say, Friday evening. > > > > > Whaddya think? You'll thank me, you'll bless me. > > > > > > > > > > And hey, really, I enjoyed hearing about your wonderful childhood. > > > > > The one thing you left out was anything about your schooling. You did > > > > > attend school, right. Well, of course you did. Sorry about that. But > > > > > did you take any courses that dealt with analytical thinking. > > > > > > > > > > What? You didn't. Well no worries. Many here say it's not my strong > > > > > suit either. > > > > > > > > > > But one starting point may be to try to remove any obvious biases > > > > > from your thinking. When you come to every situation with a fixed > > > > > mindset, it sort of closes the door on any opportunity to learn > > > > > something. > > > > > > > > > > And yes, in case you were wondering, I do "love ya like brother" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Michael Jackson mjackson74@ > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Every exchange like this just reinforces my belief that long term > > > > > > TM makes ones brain turn into mush and removes the ability to think > > > > > > clearly. > > > > > > > > > > > > How many times do you hear reporters give a show of hand wringing > > > > > > over the fate of convicted rapists? > > > > > > > > > > > > A reporters job > > > > > > is to report the facts, not commiserate with the criminals - in no > > > > > > way shape or form was Crowley's remarks objective and the other > > > > > > reporters were even worse. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah Poppy Harlow started it - could Crowley not have used her TM > > > > > > enhanced Creative Intelligence to say "Hey what are you doing > > > > > > Poppy!?! > > > > > > > > > > > > The standard of conduct I was referring to in my other post has > > > > > > nothing to do with 1950's - Jesus you people are beyond hope - its > > > > > > no wonder Turq cusses > > > > > > you out from time to time. > > > > > > > > > > > > Your attitude seems to be - "Oh Candy is a TM'er and so anything > > > > > > she does is beyond reproach" - you people really are screwed up. > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at what the non-TM world thinks of this crap: > > > > > > > > > > > > "CNN's unconscionable coverage of the Steubenville Rape Case > > > > > > verdict is > > > > > > pissing everyone off. Newscaster Candy Crowley, general > > > > > > correspondent > > > > > > Poppy Harlow, and legal expert Paul Callan all did their very best > > > > > > to > > > > > > focus solely on the guilty verdict's repercussions on the two > > > > > > rapists. > > > > > > There's next to no coverage of the girl who was brutally raped; > > > > > > instead, > > > > > > they talk almost exclusively of the rapistsâ€" the two > > > > > > teenagers who had > > > > > > such bright futures, and now their lives are completely ruined from > > > > > > this > > > > > > one little indiscretion. Isn't it a shame how they suffer?" > > > > > > > > > > > > http://jezebel.com/5991018/heres-what-cnn-shouldve-said-about-the-steubenville-rape-case > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: Share Long sharelong60@ > > > > > > To: "[email protected]" [email protected] > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 11:40 AM > > > > > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM and its Rock Stars > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > Thank you for this balanced view, Steve. It helped me clarify > > > > > > my own thoughts and feelings about it. Isn't it usually the > > > > > > news director who chooses the angle of a news story? I thought > > > > > > Crowley's intro of the reporter was objective. It was the > > > > > > reporter Harlow who was initially sympathetic to the 2 boys. > > > > > > And the legal expert Callan who came after her was very > > > > > > sympathetic. I'm just wondering if the news director chose him > > > > > > too and was attempting to present a balanced story. Crowley > > > > > > herself is the single mom of two teenaged boys but nonetheless I > > > > > > thought her comments were mostly objective given what she was > > > > > > commenting on, meaning the less objective angles taken by the > > > > > > reporter and the expert. In any case, I think for some on FFL > > > > > > it's damned if you do and damned if you don't. Meaning if you > > > > > > do TM and you make mistakes then TM isn't what it claims to > > > > > > be. But if you are successful and do TM and promote it, then > > > > > > it's because you're afraid of > > > > > > angering Oprah (-:    > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: seventhray27 steve.sundur@ > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 9:11 AM > > > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM and its Rock Stars > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Michael Jackson mjackson74@ > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And what do you consider whining about the effects of a > > > > > > > relatively light sentence handed down on two punks who abused an > > > > > > > unconscious girl? > > > > > > It has been suggested here, that a person does not have full brain > > > > > > development until they are 25.  And I think the part of the > > > > > > brain that is not fully developed, IIRC is that part which > > > > > > evaluates the future consequences of our actions. I am just putting > > > > > > that out there as one thing to consider. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And are you losing sight that our criminal justice system is a more > > > > > > merciful system, with second and third chances.  Maybe you > > > > > > don't like that fact. > > > > > > > Juvenile? Insensitive? Adding to the already atrocious attitudes > > > > > > > about women who are raped and sexually abused and the boys will > > > > > > > be boys attitude > > > > > > about their attackers? > > > > > > What are you talking about?  Not sure what you feel would be > > > > > > an appropriate punishment in this case.  And > > > > > > evidently you feel it is out of line to feel sympathy for those > > > > > > boys.  I feel sympathy for them. As well as the young woman. > > > > > >  That goes without saying. > > > > > > > Or is it ok to express such attitudes when one is a TM > > > > > > > Practitioner? > > > > > > Finally.  Well it took a little while for you to get to your > > > > > > main point.  I suspect, this case has little meaning for you, > > > > > > outside of the "tie in".  > > > > > > > If TM celebrities are people to be looked up to since their TM > > > > > > > practice makes them phenomenal people, surely they should be held > > > > > > > to even a modicum of decent behavior, I am not even suggesting a > > > > > > > higher standard of behavior than poor non-TM'ers. Now here is a > > > > > > > subject for discussion on FFL and I have probably posted out. > > > > > > I am not sure what behavior you would consider exemplary > > > > > > in your opinion, but I suspect that you want to see 1950 > > > > > > stereotypes of model citizens.  I don't think it works that > > > > > > way. > > > > > > > > > > > > As regards Girish, unfortunately, you see it in every strata of > > > > > > life, where people who hold positions of power, will abuse that > > > > > > power.  Those in the TMO are not immune to that.  But I'd > > > > > > suspect that it may be more prevalent in countries where there has > > > > > > not been much progress in women's rights.  But likely these > > > > > > types of incidents move cultures in that direction. > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > From: feste37 feste37@ > > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:48 AM > > > > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM and its Rock Stars > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ÃÆ'‚ > > > > > > > You are not a > > > > > > disciplined thinker, MJ. You just pour out anything that enters > > > > > > your head, and you seem obsessed with criticizing other people's > > > > > > behavior. I find it all very juvenile. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Michael Jackson mjackson74@ > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tell it to the tens of thousands of people who are reviling her > > > > > > > > for her sympathy for a couple of true idiots and abusers of a > > > > > > > > passed out 16 year old girl - in true TM addle-headed fashion, > > > > > > > > you are excusing asinine behavior purely because it is behavior > > > > > > > > of a TM'er and a TM'er who has been used to tout the greatness > > > > > > > > of TM - deal with it feste - TM is no panacea and a whole bunch > > > > > > > > of these celebrities like Howard Stern, Russell Brand, and > > > > > > > > Lynch himself are, perversely excellent poster children of TM > > > > > > > > for their bad behavior because it unintentionally highlights > > > > > > > > all that is screwed up and hypocritical in the Movement, but > > > > > > > > much like those who post some trivial bull manure that is > > > > > > happening in Latin America as "proof" of Raja Luis's phenomenal > > > > > > success in setting up flying groups there, while ignoring the other > > > > > > 25 things that are gong wrong in the same geographical area, you > > > > > > continue to embrace fantasy as reality. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > From: feste37 feste37@ > > > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 9:24 PM > > > > > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM and its Rock Stars > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ > > > > > &g
