Yeah all this just reiterates that MJ may be a nice guy but he is totally 
idiotic, emotionally stunted, delusional even to use this incredibly 
distressing, painful rape incident - complex in its conception and implications 
to peddle his anti-TM paranoia. He's definitely crossed all limits here.


On Mar 19, 2013, at 3:44 PM, "authfriend" <[email protected]> wrote:

> --- In [email protected], Michael Jackson <mjackson74@...> wrote:
> >
> > Every exchange like this just reinforces my belief that long
> > term TM makes ones brain turn into mush and removes the
> > ability to think clearly.
> 
> Right, Michael, you're obviously the clear-thinking one here.
> Too bad you haven't been able to address a single one of the
> points that have been made. Too bad you can only make your
> case by wildly exaggerating what was said in that clip.
> 
> > How many times do you hear reporters give a show of hand
> > wringing over the fate of convicted rapists?
> 
> Is that what they were doing? Or were they deliberately
> emphasizing how bad the consequences were going to be
> for these boys *as a warning* to other boys who might
> be tempted to engage in similar misbehavior? As in: This
> was a crime, and these guys are going to suffer for it
> the rest of their lives. You don't want to end up like
> them.
> 
> > A reporters job
> > is to report the facts, not commiserate with the criminals
> 
> Neither of them was "commiserating with the criminals."
> That's insane.
> 
> (snip)
> > Your attitude seems to be - "Oh Candy is a TM'er and so
> > anything she does is beyond reproach" - you people 
> > really are screwed up.
> 
> No, buster, that you would think any of us had that
> attitude is what's really screwed up.
> 
> > Take a look at what the non-TM world thinks of this crap:
> > 
> > "CNN's unconscionable coverage of the Steubenville Rape
> > Case verdict is pissing everyone off.
> 
> For the record, there were seven segments on CNN on Sunday
> about the verdict, not just the breaking-news item, which
> is what all the fuss is about. You can check out transcripts
> of all the segments here:
> 
> http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/2013.03.17.html
> 
> Interestingly, in the breaking-news item, following the
> appearance of the legal expert, Crowley and Harlow
> continued their discussion. Here's the transcript of
> that portion of the breaking-news item (which was not
> included in the clip):
> 
> -----
> CROWLEY: Paul, thanks. I want to bring Poppy back in -- because, Poppy, 
> there's -- you know, the 16-year-old victim, her life, never the same, again. 
> And I understand you have been talking to some of the families involved. 
> 
> HARLOW: Her life never the same again. Absolutely, Candy. The last thing she 
> wanted to do was sit on that stand and testify. She didn't want to bring 
> these charges. She said it was up to her parents. 
> 
> But I want to tell our viewers about a statement that her mother just made, 
> just made in the court after the sentencing. Her mother just said that she 
> has pity on the two young boys that did this. She said human compassion is 
> not taught by teachers or coaches. It's a God-given gift, saying that you 
> displayed a lack of compassion, a lack of moral code, saying that you were 
> your own accuser throughout this for posting about this all over social 
> media. And she said she takes pity on them. 
> 
> As far as her daughter, she said she will persevere, she will get through 
> this. But the words of an angry mother who now has a sentence, that I believe 
> she would consider or a verdict, just -- Candy.
> 
> CROWLEY: CNN's Poppy Harlow, thank you. Also to our legal contributor Paul 
> Callan.
> 
> Of course, we will be following this story throughout the day.
> -----
> 
> And they did. But the jezebel.com post says:
> 
> > Newscaster Candy Crowley, general correspondent Poppy
> > Harlow, and legal expert Paul Callan all did their very
> > best to focus solely on the guilty verdict's repercussions
> > on the two rapists. There's next to no coverage of the
> > girl who was brutally raped; instead, they talk almost
> > exclusively of the rapistsâ€" the two teenagers who had 
> > such bright futures, and now their lives are completely
> > ruined from this one little indiscretion. Isn't it a shame
> > how they suffer?"
> 
> This is simply not true, as you can see from the transcript
> above. I read the transcripts of a couple of the later
> segments on Sunday on the verdict, and it isn't true of them
> either.
> 
> As I said, I'm not a fan of Crowley. But she has been treated
> unfairly in this discussion for the purpose of advancing an
> anti-TM agenda. And I think that stinks.
> 
> 

Reply via email to