--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: <snip> > > But I think you've answered my original question: > > you think he failed (in my terms) whether or not TM, > > properly administered, could save the world (in other > > words, you don't know whether TM could save the world). > > You think incorrectly, if you think that's what > I said. I believe he failed at living his life > well. Whether the world could be "saved" or not > is irrelevant. The only thing that is important > IMO is, if you have announced "saving the world" > publicly as your goal, you should act as if you > believed it, and put your best effort into > achieving it. I remain unconvinced that Maharishi > did either after about 1975.
OK, so you *didn't* answer my original question. But what is the issue of whether the world could be saved irrelevant *to*, in your view? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
