--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... <no_reply@...> wrote: <snip> > > > > > > > > The only thing unique about you is your lack of self awareness. But > > > > then, of course you know that. So continue with your falsehoods and > > > > trickery and know that most of us have your number, except for your > > > > girlfriend, Curtis. > > > > > > So let just understand how you are intending this as an insult to me Jim. > > > Are you implying that Barry and I have a gay relationship and that this > > > would somehow be an insult because of your negative views of gay people? > > **I don't have any negative views of gay people, though I have sometimes had > negative views of people that happened to be gay. My best friend for 32 years > was gay, and died of AIDS. He was also my younger brother, RIP. So, fuck you, > on assumption #1.>
Me: You have claimed this before and have used it as if it might give you a pass on some very nasty gender based and gay insults. You only mention him in this context, and include very hostile curses when you invoke him as your defense. Like your claim of enlightenment, there is a very large disconnect between your claim and your behavior. If it is actually true it only doubles the idiocy of using sex and gay references in your putdowns for people who disagree with you or who you don't like. It is a common theme for your tantrums here, the use of images of homosexual references as if that is an insult to another man. It is a consistent theme of how you characterize how Barry and I relate to each other. I am against that kind of insult. Your get out of homophobia-charge free card has expired. Stop making gay and gender based insults. > > > > Or are you saying that I am a female and therefor worthy of contempt > > > because I am really an inferior woman rather than a man? > > **My wife, daughter, and sister-in-law could *easily*, each separately, kick > your ass. Turn you into meat. #2 goes down in flames too. So your proof of your lack of gender issues is to create a violent imaginary scenario where your wife or daughter would engage in a physical altercation with a man. Yeah, that was very convincing. You don't add up dude. > > **Hmmmmm...course correction time, Ethel?? > > > > > > > In your anger you always reveal your hidden cards Jim. You are a very > > > unpleasant person underneath the "I am enlightened, no really , I am > > > really enlightened, no really I am" rap. > > > > > Message number one, Ethel: Enlightened people can be very unpleasant to > > fools (like you). > > > > My reference was to Fred and Ethel, you and Barry. I just quickly painted > > the picture, which still draws a chuckle from me. Read anything at all into > > it. Then own it, and act on your assumptions. After that, you will truly > > know the difference between experience and beliefs. Or given your's and > > Fred's track record, probably not. :-) > > > > PS Fred called me a "meanie". Ain't that a hoot?? > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Your analysis might apply to people he does not like. > > > > > > He is not open to being vulnerable to people who he > > > > > > does not like. Sometimes this is people who attack > > > > > > him, but not always. He didn't like you right off. > > > > > > > > > > That's not quite correct. Robin struck me from Day > > > > > One as someone so uninteresting that I couldn't force > > > > > myself to plow through his bloviated language. He > > > > > still does. I clicked on this post of his by hitting > > > > > Next on the previous one, read no more than the first > > > > > 10 words and realized who it was from the shitty > > > > > writing, and only then looked up at the top to confirm > > > > > the sender. At that point, I hit Next again. I do not > > > > > and will not apologize for this. Life's too short to > > > > > waste on pissants, especially wordy ones. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > So you only see the version of Barry that applies to > > > > > > you, a person he does not respect. > > > > > > > > > > This is more correct, although to be accurate, I would > > > > > say, "a person he barely acknowledges the existence of." :-) > > > > > > > > > > BTW, I *expected* him to make a reappearance about now. > > > > > The combination of you being present and his primary > > > > > devotee and groupie not being present this week was > > > > > too tempting for him to resist. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
