--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "card" <cardemaister@> wrote: > > > > > > Just saw a Norwegian TV program about back pain. According > > to it, in most cases the reason for that pain remains a mystery. > > > > One new hypothesis is that the 60 - 70 muscles in the lower > > back must work in synchrony, otherwise back pain might be a result. > > > > A while back got the worst BP in several years. Nothing of my > > usual "remedies" seemed to help. So decided to try YF, although > > don't do it regularly, it being a way too strong technique for > > a gynophobic Ass (Asperger) like myself. > > > > Was extremely amazed when after about 5 mins of YF, even without > > almost any physical movement, the pain was all but gone! > > > > Please, use yer imagination: the above hypothesis might explain, why YF > > could be that effective!? > > > Humans have naturally weak backs. It's one of the scars of evolution. > While YF may be good for back pain, all that sitting around before- > hand most definitely is not good. Most of the group I was on a long > course with had back problems after a while. Luckily there was a > osteopath/chiropractor? on the course who sorted us out. > > One way YF proved to be good for my back was how it cured a partially slipped > disc. Those things are agony when they go and I'd been periodically suffering > for years but a few weeks after learning YF I had a rush of kundalini energy > (I assume) that shot up my spine, a feeling like a hot hand had grabbed my > spine where the damage was and shook it for a few seconds, it never bothered > me again! > > Miraculous healing. Far out but all amazing experiences etc to do with it > stopped after a while and just seemed like tedious routine. >
Those flashy experiences in the beginning might not be that good, because one might start to anticipate them and that could interfere with the correct practice??
