--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@...> wrote:
>
> Transcendental Consciousness isn't an experience.

I think you mean UNconsciousness.

 
> L
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the water analogy.  Can you say more about the context of the 
> > bliss and blissful quote?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> >  From: wgm4u <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 6:03 PM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Dome Rot;
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Also no trepidation because what is there to be afraid of?   It's all
> > changing all the time, death happening all around you all the time.  What 
> > did
> > Maharishi say about the relative?  One mass of death.  And in the midst 
> > of all
> > that change and death, something so alive and unchanging. 
> > >
> > > He also said bliss is not always blissful.  I think many people >>like 
> > > to
> > >>ignore the ramifications of that.
> > 
> > 'Bliss' is a poor translation of the profound Sanskrit word 'anandam', as 
> > MMY says "contact with Brahman brings bliss". In other words, if you 
> > haven't experienced anandam (indescribable bliss) you haven't fully 
> > consciously transcended, even once!
> > 
> > His comment bliss is not always blissful is wholly taken out of context and 
> > misleading (one comment in 50+ years like this).
> > 
> > At first, the self experiences bliss (TC) as the true Self or the EGO 
> > (ahamkara), much like taking a drink out of a glass of water, as the 
> > experiences advances it's much like the greater bliss of a pitcher of 
> > water,(GC) as it advances even further the pitcher breaks and one 
> > experiences ONESELF as pure unbounded bliss (UC). (SAT-Chit-Ananda)
> >
>


Reply via email to