Thank you dear and you have a good weekend too.

On May 24, 2013, at 8:10 AM, Share Long <sharelon...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hope all the Dr. RCs have a wonderful Memorial Day weekend (-:
> 
> From: Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.r...@gmail.com>
> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 1:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ego distortion
> 
>  
> Yeah dear Dr RC, Psy. D, UCLA - the compassionate, empathetic therapist. I 
> love the man, he has a hard job to do. The pain, suffering, sacrifice the man 
> had to endure.
> 
> But don't forget the other two RC's - fucking fundamentalists, cultists both. 
> I'm telling you dear, they are out to get you - beware !!!
> 
> 
> On May 23, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Share Long <sharelon...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>>  
>> thanks for being patient with me, Dr. RC
>> 
>> From: Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.r...@gmail.com>
>> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
>> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 12:23 PM
>> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ego distortion
>> 
>>  
>> Salyavin,
>> 
>> You missed my point, I was addressing Barry's unhealthy attention seeking 
>> behavior not denying his or anyone's need for attention.
>> 
>> Every one needs attention. I myself learned to find emotionally healthy ways 
>> to express my need for attention which requires a healthy display of 
>> vulnerability and I also learned to express empathy - as in acknowledge 
>> others need for attention and their vulnerability.
>> 
>> I learned all this, in a very hard way though, by my 30th year, and here's 
>> Barry a 65 plus old adult emotionally stunted, no healthy of expressing 
>> attention, no healthy ways of empathizing with others.
>> 
>> Vulnerability equates to weakness, empathy equates to weakness. Share's 
>> another - she is afraid she will be controlled by fundamentalists if she 
>> displays any vulnerability.
>> 
>> 
>> On May 23, 2013, at 9:25 AM, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodle...@mail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> 
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Barry Wright wants attention
>>> 
>>> Why do you lot give him so much if you object to it?
>>> 
>>> > 
>>> > Barry Wright loves attention
>>> > 
>>> > Barry Wright would kill for attention
>>> > 
>>> > Yet he can't reveal it. He is the very troll, attention slut he accuses 
>>> > others of. I call him emotionally stunted - a therapist, psychologist who 
>>> > follow attachment theory may call him dismissive-avoidant.
>>> > 
>>> > He is a Rama/Lenz TB - now he had to yell and scream at others being TB's.
>>> > 
>>> > Share and Xeno are his fans.
>>> > 
>>> > Pathetic.
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > On May 23, 2013, at 8:41 AM, "Ann" <awoelflebater@...> wrote:
>>> > 
>>> > > 
>>> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > "I yam what I yam, as Popeye used to say. I don't
>>> > > > really give much of a shit what other people think
>>> > > > of what I yam."--Barry Wright, last week
>>> > > > 
>>> > > > The interesting thing about Barry's posts is
>>> > > > that while he claims he doesn't give much of
>>> > > > a shit what other people think of what he is,
>>> > > > he still obviously wants to make absolutely
>>> > > > sure we know what *he* thinks of what he is.
>>> > > 
>>> > > 
>>> > > 
>>> > > 
>>> > > 
>>> > > 
>>> > > 
>>> > > > 
>>> > > > 
>>> > > > 
>>> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Well that worked. :-)
>>> > > > > 
>>> > > > > Doc, I have no interest in anything you say because it's
>>> > > > > always the same -- "**I** am > > being enlightened or even halfway 
>>> > > > > intelligent here> and 
>>> > > > > you're not!!!" 
>>> > > > > 
>>> > > > > Because you'd obviously gotten *your* buttons pushed this
>>> > > > > week by me stating obvious truths about the TMO and 
>>> > > > > reminding people of your somewhat sordid FFL past, I 
>>> > > > > figured I'd just "help you out the door" by pushing your 
>>> > > > > buttons even more. And it worked. "You're toast, and I'm 
>>> > > > > not." That's my counterpart of your act. :-)
>>> > > > > 
>>> > > > > You can rant your fantasies about my life all you want.
>>> > > > > In fact, do so more often, and at the beginning of a 
>>> > > > > week, so we don't have to listen to them all week. :-)
>>> > > > > 
>>> > > > > But I'll stand on the posts I make themselves. If any-
>>> > > > > one actually *believes* that I was affected by anything
>>> > > > > you said in your button-pushed rants this week, that is
>>> > > > > their prerogative, and their folly. I just saw an oppor-
>>> > > > > tunity to get you out of our hair, and took it. 
>>> > > > > 
>>> > > > > And I might do it again next week, because frankly you're
>>> > > > > too stupid to realize what's being done to you and learn
>>> > > > > from it. Or I might just ignore your silly ass entirely, 
>>> > > > > which will have exactly the same effect. :-)
>>> > > > > 
>>> > > > > It's YOU that yearns for attention, for pats on the back, 
>>> > > > > and for "support" from your fellow minions, not me. THAT
>>> > > > > is what put you on the bench. 
>>> > > > > 
>>> > > > > While you're on the No Self Control Bench for the next
>>> > > > > few days, say hello to all of your other multiple FFL
>>> > > > > personalities for me. I, for one, can't wait to meet
>>> > > > > the next one, when you discover that you've exhausted
>>> > > > > the doctordumbass one. :-)
>>> > > > > 
>>> > > > > 
>>> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote:
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > Do you have the hots for me, or something, Barry Wright? All this 
>>> > > > > > about wanting me to be a woman. Dude, last night may not have 
>>> > > > > > gone well for you, but I think now lusting after my ass is a bit 
>>> > > > > > much, don't you?
>>> > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > You have no substantial reaction to my posts this week, except 
>>> > > > > > the feeling like ice water running down your back, and the 
>>> > > > > > tightening of your sphincter. You have made poor choices in your 
>>> > > > > > life, and you are all bent out of shape when I point them out to 
>>> > > > > > you. Your life here is a never ending rant against your core 
>>> > > > > > unhappiness. Please, go back to sleep, dreaming deeply, and all 
>>> > > > > > will be well. Perhaps you can even fantasize you and I having 
>>> > > > > > sex?? Whatever works...
>>> > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > Two things, TB: I am enlightened, established in infinite silence 
>>> > > > > > during activity, and...and...you aren't. Your narcissism gives 
>>> > > > > > new meaning to the expression, "Go fuck your [small] self".:-)
>>> > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > PS Your arithmetic is off. That's 50 for me. Thanks for all the 
>>> > > > > > feedback from Message View, genius!!
>>> > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Sez the guy with only two posts left for the week,
>>> > > > > > > after demonstrating a veritable orgy of attachment
>>> > > > > > > and defensiveness all week. :-)
>>> > > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > > I must admit to one belief. The best thing that 
>>> > > > > > > *ever* happened on Fairfield Life was Rick being
>>> > > > > > > convinced to institute -- and enforce -- the 
>>> > > > > > > Posting Limits. 
>>> > > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > > Try to imagine what this forum would be like without
>>> > > > > > > them. A few compulsives could -- and would -- be
>>> > > > > > > flooding the place with post after post after post
>>> > > > > > > after post, trying to "win" their imaginary ego-
>>> > > > > > > battles with sheer volume alone. 
>>> > > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > > I hereby nominate Rick for sainthood. :-)
>>> > > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > > Unless the "post flood" consisted of hundreds of
>>> > > > > > > posts from Doc "explaining" why he encouraged people 
>>> > > > > > > here to believe he was female for all those months. 
>>> > > > > > > I'd never get tired of that. :-)
>>> > > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > > Who else feels Doc building up to a new "identity
>>> > > > > > > change?" It's about time for one, after all...
>>> > > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > On the other hand, Barry is not the one who has 
>>> > > > > > > > > > pissed away 40 posts so far this week trying 
>>> > > > > > > > > > to play spiritual one-upsmanship games and 
>>> > > > > > > > > > convince himself that someone -- ANYONE -- 
>>> > > > > > > > > > actually believes he's enlightened.
>>> > > > > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > > > > My sense is that DrD doesn't give a shit whether
>>> > > > > > > > > anybody considers him enlightened.
>>> > > > > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > > > Yeah, Denial and acceptance, vs. non-attachment. Denial and 
>>> > > > > > > > acceptance are choices made by the mind. Non-attachment, on 
>>> > > > > > > > the other hand, is a condition of the mind. Denial and 
>>> > > > > > > > acceptance are willful acts. Non-attachment simply is. 
>>> > > > > > > > Non-attachment is a functioning of the mind and body that is 
>>> > > > > > > > automatic. To attempt to fake it, quickly becomes awkward.
>>> > > > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > > > Without silence always present in the mind, the only 
>>> > > > > > > > correlate for non-attachment, is some willful act of the 
>>> > > > > > > > mind. Without the presence of ongoing silence in the mind, 
>>> > > > > > > > the mind never rests, and spends most of its time spinning 
>>> > > > > > > > its stories. With no silence in the mind, non-attachment is 
>>> > > > > > > > both invisible, and impossible.
>>> > > > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > > > So, with silence always present in the mind, not only does an 
>>> > > > > > > > enlightened person not give a shit whether others think so, 
>>> > > > > > > > it is *impossible* to give a shit, about such a thing. It is 
>>> > > > > > > > as if someone came up to you, and challenged that you were 
>>> > > > > > > > breathing air. Comes across as a ridiculous question, so deep 
>>> > > > > > > > is the mind anchored in silence.
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to