--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:46 AM, nablusoss1008 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>wrote: > > > > > > Certainly he has had no mystical > > > experiences compared to hundreds and thousands of > > > mystics of various religions in the past or even > > > compared to Amma, > > > > Ravi, > > > > 1) may I ask WHY you would have liked Maharishi to talk about his > > "mystical experiences" ? > > > > Why does one talk about and forever remember their first love, > their first kiss, the first sex, the first woman they loved? > Or the first time they got drunk, first time they got stoned? > Unless you were a Baniya/businessman and an Indian who married > a woman based on her caste, color, region, language, > social status. > > Mystical experiences are much more profound, transformatve, > blissful that one would be compelled to talk about it. If you > don't have it you talk philosophy, you spit platitudes like > Xeno, like writing a book on Love. > > So it's not a question of why but why wouldn't he if he had > any - it would be very perplexing and bizarre.
NOT that I think Maharishi would have had a whole shitload of mystical experiences to talk about -- I don't -- but WHY on earth would he ever consider talking about them with RAVI? I mean, we're talking about the guy who had to MAKE UP experiences of being enlightened to impress people on this group, and his soon-to-be-ex-wife, and her Amma friends who wouldn't have given him the time of day *unless* he made them up. Put up or shut up. Write about some of your "first kiss" mystical experiences. Without making them up this time.
