what would be interesting would be to know you exact birth time, but tell the jyotish-ee you don't and see if he can get it right.
________________________________ From: John <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 10:24 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: RD's astrological analysis Share, Birth rectification is a complicated process if you want the accuracy to the exact minute. It would require knowing the most important events of your life such as marriages and deaths of close relatives. But for you, a difference of 5 to 7 minutes should not change the lagna in the rashi chart. It may not even change your navamsa lagna. You can test it out for yourself. If you're getting good predictions for the time you're using now, then you should stay with it. Nonetheless, the transit of Jupiter in Gemini should be good for you. If you're looking for a new relationship, you should be able to find one this year and the next. --- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > John, Ravi and noozguru my birth time was written down on my birth > certificate as 2:55 pm which is much less suspect than 3 pm. Nonetheless one > jyotishi said if that was my true birth time I would have been a boy! So he > did a rectification, ended up with a time after after 3 and that did not feel > right to me. The best rectification was done by Prasannan, who used to be > Amma's jyotishi. He put the time at 2:48:30 and that felt right to me. He > simply asked me if I knew my Dad's mother and I said yes and gave details. > That was the basis of his rectification which I found fascinating. Have any > of you heard of this technique for rectifying birth times? > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Bhairitu <noozguru@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 5:49 PM > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: RD's astrological analysis > > > > Â > If anything, in the US the birth times are usually written down later > than the actual birth time. Back in those days the doctor would deliver > the kid and then take a smoke break and write down on the birth > certificate the time that was on the clock. Supposedly later a nurses > association lobbied for accurate birth times. It was suspected for > astrological purposes but I wouldn't be surprised if hospital legal > councils got on-board due to possible legal ramifications not having > anything to do with astrology. > > Happy Birthday. You now have a year before officially becoming an old > fart though of course at 59 1/2 you can take money out of those > retirement accounts without penalty. > > On 06/20/2013 02:45 PM, doctordumbass@... wrote: > > Forgot to add that I think the birth time is accurate, as it is taken from > > my birth certificate. > > > > --- In [email protected], doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote: > >> Thank you, Ravi! Yes, I am looking forward to my 60th! Aries ascendant is > >> fine, also. I know nothing about this process, so I will just answer your > >> questions for you. > >> > >> --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> > >> wrote: > >>> Ah I failed to notice your birthday, so wrapped up I was in planets, signs > >>> and houses I forgot there are days tied to a chart, and there are > >>> birthdays > >>> :-) > >>> > >>> Happy Birthday Jim - hope you have a good one !!! > >>> > >>> In India the 60th birthday is sort of a milestone - astrologically Jupiter > >>> and Saturn return to their exact natal position in 60 years. So I suppose > >>> the person reaches full maturity, wisdom (unless of course your first name > >>> is Barry and last name Wright). > >>> > >>> Coming to your birth chart - my vote is for the Aries ascendant, this is > >>> based upon on my perceptions of you. Of course then your 3:28 AM time > >>> raises the question of whether it is a rectified TOB - is this true? > >>> Because TOB is usually rounded off to the nearest quarter hour, in my case > >>> my TOB is 7:00 AM. > >>> > >>> But if you disagree with Aries ascendant - I will present my arguments for > >>> it and we can discuss. > >>> > >>> Ravi > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:55 AM, doctordumbass@ < > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> ** > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Hi Ravi, using PDT is correct. The second paragraph is overall closer to > >>>> daily life. I have a lot of characteristics of the first, particularly > >>>> when > >>>> I had a career, but comparing the two, I am more the second one. > >>>> Thanks! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> Jim - a small issue, pulled up your chart and your Ascendant is right at > >>>>> the cusp - 29Ar33. A minute and half later and the Ascendant changes to > >>>>> Taurus (this is the sidereal zodiac mind you). I also have the summer > >>>> time > >>>>> (PDT) - so confirm this before I proceed. > >>>>> > >>>>> Please let me know what you think identifies you - the first or the > >>>> second > >>>>> paragraph. > >>>>> > >>>>> You in you daily life are dynamic, energetic, enthusiastic, quick to > >>>>> take > >>>>> initiative, react quickly. You have spent lot of your intelligence in > >>>> your > >>>>> life for an ideal or a cause, excited by the adventure and freedom, > >>>> belief > >>>>> in order, structure, respect for teachers,authoritarian figures. > >>>>> > >>>>> You in your daily life are more steady, methodical, deliberate, > >>>> practical. > >>>>> You are laidback, love pleasures of the sense - you spend lot of your > >>>>> intelligence in your life nurturing your connection to nature, land, > >>>> home, > >>>>> comfort, care towards family (though you must have felt weighed down by > >>>> the > >>>>> responsibilities). > >>>>> > >>>>> Remember some of these themes may recur regardless of your ascendant so > >>>>> choose one that really identifies you - the first one is Aries Ascendant > >>>>> with Mars in 9th whereas the latter Taurus Ascendant with Venus in 3rd. > >>>>> > >>>>> I personally think Aries ascendant, your time of 3:28 is good - but do > >>>> let > >>>>> me know what you think. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:56 PM, doctordumbass@ < > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> ** > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hey Ravi, my two cents, as a dabbler in the stars, this analysis seemed > >>>>>> deeper, more refined, than the one you wrote for Ann. Piques my > >>>> interest. I > >>>>>> took my first breath, here, at 3:28 AM, June 20th, 1954, in Chula > >>>> Vista, > >>>>>> California. What does that reflect? > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >
