Thank you John for this and also for your analysis of Oprah's chart. Powerful 
chart for sure! As for new relationship, how do you read the second marriage, 
from the 9th house? What's interesting to me is that my first marriage which 
was over 40 years ago when I knew nothing about all this, began during Ketu 
Mars. Now I'm in Mars Ketu but with the added feature of natal Ketu in first 
being transited by both Rahu and Saturn in Libra. 

Saturn in Libra has always been good for me, lots of discipline and will power 
and this time, stability and settledness too. The last time Rahu and Ketu 
transited one another I met the man who was my SO for 15 years. And now with 
Guru transiting Venus, Merc and later Sun in 9th, yes I would think it's a good 
time for relationship. Funny as I write this I'm remembering that today is a 
traditional Savitri celebration for longevity of husband!


Yes, I realize my lagna won't change, but the beginning of buktis and subbuktis 
can change quite a bit with change of birth time. Prasannan knew major events 
in my life, but the key one was that my paternal grandmother was alive when I 
was born. From that and info about the month and year of her death, he 
calculated my birth time and it feels right in terms of when the dasas and 
subdasas change.

Finally I want to say, especially to those who don't enjoy jyotish which is ok 
with me, enjoy what you enjoy, what I want to say is that I'm sure the jyotish 
chart of anyone can indicate how they will feel about jyotish AND whether or 
not they will have good jyotishis in their life (-:


________________________________
 From: John <jr_...@yahoo.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 9:24 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: RD's astrological analysis
 


  
Share,

Birth rectification is a complicated process if you want the accuracy to the 
exact minute.  It would require knowing the most important events of your life 
such as marriages and deaths of close relatives.  But for you, a difference of 
5 to 7 minutes should not change the lagna in the rashi chart.  It may not even 
change your navamsa lagna.  You can test it out for yourself.

If you're getting good predictions for the time you're using now, then you 
should stay with it.

Nonetheless, the transit of Jupiter in Gemini should be good for you.  If 
you're looking for a new relationship, you should be able to find one this year 
and the next. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote:
>
> John, Ravi and noozguru my birth time was written down on my birth 
> certificate as 2:55 pm which is much less suspect than 3 pm. Nonetheless one 
> jyotishi said if that was my true birth time I would have been a boy! So he 
> did a rectification, ended up with a time after after 3 and that did not feel 
> right to me. The best rectification was done by Prasannan, who used to be 
> Amma's jyotishi. He put the time at 2:48:30 and that felt right to me. He 
> simply asked me if I knew my Dad's mother and I said yes and gave details. 
> That was the basis of his rectification which I found fascinating. Have any 
> of you heard of this technique for rectifying birth times? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: Bhairitu <noozguru@...>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 5:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: RD's astrological analysis
> 
> 
> 
>   
> If anything, in the US the birth times are usually written down later 
> than the actual birth time.  Back in those days the doctor would deliver 
> the kid and then take a smoke break and write down on the birth 
> certificate the time that was on the clock.  Supposedly later a nurses 
> association lobbied for accurate birth times.  It was suspected for 
> astrological purposes but I wouldn't be surprised if hospital legal 
> councils got on-board due to possible legal ramifications not having 
> anything to do with astrology.
> 
> Happy Birthday.  You now have a year before officially becoming an old 
> fart though of course at 59 1/2 you can take money out of those 
> retirement accounts without penalty.
> 
> On 06/20/2013 02:45 PM, doctordumbass@... wrote:
> > Forgot to add that I think the birth time is accurate, as it is taken from 
> > my birth certificate.
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote:
> >> Thank you, Ravi! Yes, I am looking forward to my 60th! Aries ascendant  is 
> >> fine, also. I know nothing about this process, so I will just answer your 
> >> questions for you.
> >>
> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> 
> >> wrote:
> >>> Ah I failed to notice your birthday, so wrapped up I was in planets, signs
> >>> and houses I forgot there are days tied to a chart, and there are 
> >>> birthdays
> >>> :-)
> >>>
> >>> Happy Birthday Jim - hope you have a good one !!!
> >>>
> >>> In India the 60th birthday is sort of a milestone - astrologically Jupiter
> >>> and Saturn return to their exact natal position in 60 years. So I suppose
> >>> the person reaches full maturity, wisdom (unless of course your first name
> >>> is Barry and last name Wright).
> >>>
> >>> Coming to your birth chart - my vote is for the Aries ascendant, this is
> >>> based upon on my perceptions of you. Of course then your 3:28 AM time
> >>> raises the question of whether it is a rectified TOB - is this true?
> >>> Because TOB is usually rounded off to the nearest quarter hour, in my case
> >>> my TOB is 7:00 AM.
> >>>
> >>> But if you disagree with Aries ascendant - I will present my arguments for
> >>> it and we can discuss.
> >>>
> >>> Ravi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:55 AM, doctordumbass@ <
> >>> no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> **
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Ravi, using PDT is correct. The second paragraph is overall closer to
> >>>> daily life. I have a lot of characteristics of the first, particularly 
> >>>> when
> >>>> I had a career, but comparing the two, I am more the second one.
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> Jim - a small issue, pulled up your chart and your Ascendant is right at
> >>>>> the cusp - 29Ar33. A minute and half later and the Ascendant changes to
> >>>>> Taurus (this is the sidereal zodiac mind you). I also have the summer
> >>>> time
> >>>>> (PDT) - so confirm this before I proceed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please let me know what you think identifies you - the first or the
> >>>> second
> >>>>> paragraph.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You in you daily life are dynamic, energetic, enthusiastic, quick to 
> >>>>> take
> >>>>> initiative, react quickly. You have spent lot of your intelligence in
> >>>> your
> >>>>> life for an ideal or a cause, excited by the adventure and freedom,
> >>>> belief
> >>>>> in order, structure, respect for teachers,authoritarian figures.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You in your daily life are more steady, methodical, deliberate,
> >>>> practical.
> >>>>> You are laidback, love pleasures of the sense - you spend lot of your
> >>>>> intelligence in your life nurturing your connection to nature, land,
> >>>> home,
> >>>>> comfort, care towards family (though you must have felt weighed down by
> >>>> the
> >>>>> responsibilities).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Remember some of these themes may recur regardless of your ascendant so
> >>>>> choose one that really identifies you - the first one is Aries Ascendant
> >>>>> with Mars in 9th whereas the latter Taurus Ascendant with Venus in 3rd.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I personally think Aries ascendant, your time of 3:28 is good - but do
> >>>> let
> >>>>> me know what you think.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:56 PM, doctordumbass@ <
> >>>>> no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> **
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hey Ravi, my two cents, as a dabbler in the stars, this analysis seemed
> >>>>>> deeper, more refined, than the one you wrote for Ann. Piques my
> >>>> interest. I
> >>>>>> took my first breath, here, at 3:28 AM, June 20th, 1954, in Chula
> >>>> Vista,
> >>>>>> California. What does that reflect?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
> >
>


 

Reply via email to