> > So,it's all about Robin, whom you never met, and > > whose posts you never read. LoL! > > turquoise: > Touché, Willy...I'll give you that one. :-) > So, you don't want to talk about the Rama levitation event. So, why then are you talking about Robin all the time?
UJELLOs? LoL! > But my Do Not Read List was so...uh...Yesterday. For > several months now I've just read what I felt like > reading, for as long as it held my interest. More > like skimming, actually, because few hold my interest > after the first few lines, let alone inspire a > response. > > Suffice it to say that your posts didn't get much > air time. You may consider this response "payoff" for > your troll bait if you like. :-) > > > > I suspect, given the posts made recently by Ann, Doc, > > > Ravi, and Judy "supporting" Robin in the face of direct > > > quotes from him that show him lying repeatedly on this > > > forum, that it might be time to repost something Xeno > > > posted earlier in the week (highlighting mine): > > > > > > Here is a simple criterion I found on the 'Net: > > > > > > 'Intellectual dishonesty is a failure to apply standards > > > of rational evaluation that one is aware of, usually in > > > a self-serving fashion. *If one judges others more > > > critically than oneself, that is intellectually dishonest.* > > > *If one deflects criticism of a friend or ally simply > > > because they are a friend or ally, that is intellectually > > > dishonest*.' > > > > > >
