Hey, Barbar, you never did tell us what "SERIAL FARTHING" means. ;-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson <mjackson74@> wrote: > > > > Thanks for these post Barry - I enjoy them. > > I enjoy writing them. If for no other reason, me rapping > about enjoying my life while ignoring what they say about > me seems to piss of the Frightened Five more than anything > else I could do. :-) > > Just look at their response...in numbers, if nothing else. > Judy's almost out of posts for the week, Ann's not far > behind, and I feel safe at guessing that neither of them > have contributed anything but insults and attempts to get > people to argue with them all week. All while trying > to hide their panic over the fact that fewer and fewer > people every week seem to be paying any attention to > anything they write. I mean, here it is Thursday morning > and I still have 30 posts to play with, and they only > have a handful between them. I think that speaks volumes > in terms of "who is affecting whom," don't you? :-) > > Judy and her small band of sycophants seem to *live* for > this stuff, but increasingly lately the only people > they've got to talk to are each other. Almost no one else > even bothers to respond. Except Xeno, and he's laughing at > them the whole time, and Share, who still foolishly > gives a shit what any of them say about her. > > I just find it fascinating -- and thus fascinating to > comment on in my cafe raps from time to time -- that > this small band of narcissists don't seem to realize how > much of themselves they give away by relating their > *fantasies* here on FFL. Almost ALL of these fantasies > seem to revolve around how much the words they've posted > to this tiny, backwater cesspool in cyberspace have > *affected* and *hurt* someone they don't like. Don't > take my word for this, just watch the trends for yourself. > > I find it all kinda sad, but then I'm perverse enough > to have noticed the trend that the more I *don't* take > them seriously, and the more I *don't* respond to them > directly, the crazier they seem to get and the earlier > in each week they "post out." So that inspires me to > take them even less seriously than ever. :-) > > The fallacy in their thinking, as far as I can tell, is > that they actually seem to believe that people CARE what > they think of them. That was Robin's biggest failing, > too, the guy they're so enamored of. They post tiny > insults, and enough of them that they often post out > mid-week. He used to write these long, boring tomes > about the people he didn't like, and *he actually > expected the people he was ranting about to read them*, > and to CARE what he thought of them. > > THAT is their common failing, and why they can be so > easily ignored. Their fantasies all revolve around the > people they gang up on feeling BAD and being *affected* > by the things they write. If enough people show them > that nothing they say has any more effect that pissing > into the wind, maybe in time they'll catch a clue and > try to find something actually interesting to contribute. > > Maybe. Either that or they'll just keep doing the same > old thing, writing to the imaginary "audiences" in their > heads, as opposed to the real-life audience that is > largely ignoring them. But how long can that last? How > long can they perpetuate their fantasies about how much > they're "affecting" the people they don't like? How long > can they keep that up? It's not as if someone could do > that for almost 20 years without catching a clue, is it? > > Oh. > > Never mind. :-)
