[FairfieldLife] words and connotations was Barry's private emails [was Re: Four for Share]

[authfriend]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote:
>
> tee hee, turq I think I've found Gru's mother right here on FFL!

And you're still here, Share. Reality isn't going away.




> ________________________________
>  From: authfriend <authfriend@...>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:03 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] words and connotations was Barry's private emails 
> [was Re: Four for Share]
>  
> 
> 
>   
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> >
> > And yet here you are Judy, wasting one of your few remaining posts to reply 
> > to alleged gibberish?! Go figure! IOW, methinks the lady doth protest too 
> > much (-:
> 
> Translation: "Oh, shit, I screwed up *again*! She must
> not have meant whatever it was I thought she meant--*I*
> can't even figure out what I had in mind now, but I was
> sure it was going to just SMITE the bitch and I was
> going to *win* one for once to show my pastoral counselor.
> Well, I'll just have to try to brazen it out as I usually
> do when I foul up, although sometimes I have the scary
> feeling that maybe I'm not all that convincing. No, no,
> I can't think about that or I'll go crazy...I can't bear
> that much reality. Somebody, HELP MEEEEEEE!!"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > ________________________________
> >  From: authfriend authfriend@
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:06 AM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] words and connotations was Barry's private emails 
> > [was Re: Four for Share]
> > 
> > Does anybody have *any* idea what the loon's problem is?
> > Both of her posts have been complete gibberish.
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Emily, excerpted from Judy's post to which I was referring: Whatever he 
> > > may have said or not said to you in private weeks ago..."There is no 
> > > basis for you to demand behind-the-scenes negotiations. So your use of 
> > > *dishonest place* doesn't make sense to me! 
> > > 
> > >  From: Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@
> > > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 1:42 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] words and connotations was Barry's private 
> > > emails [was Re: Four for Share]
> > > 
> > > snip
> > > Also, Share, nothing you said here makes any sense at all.  Just 
> > > an observation for you.  Every time you sink into some kind of 
> > > revenge post - it backfires on you because you can't think clearly from a 
> > > dishonest place.    
> > > 
> > > On Jul 15, 2013, at 7:13 AM, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote:
> > > 
> > > >Ravi and Doc, yep funny how Judy and others referred to Robin's emails 
> > > >to me as private whereas when she referred to my alleged demands for 
> > > >such, she used the term behind the scenes. So, Robin sends private 
> > > >emails to Share but Share *demands* emails that are *behind the scenes* 
> > > >Go figure!
> > > >
> > > >Here's an editorial exercise exploring connotations by reversing Judy's 
> > > >wordings:
> > > >Last month Robin emailed Share *behind the scenes.* AND 
> > > >Share has demanded that
> > >  the upsets between her and Robin be discussed via private
> > >  emails. Private and demanded being Judy's word
> > >  choices.
> > > >
> > > >Share says: I have requested that Robin and I discuss our upsets via 
> > > >direct, offline emails.
>