Oh, Auth, you don't have to call me Obba.
You can call me O http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQXVHITd1N4
:) 

--- In [email protected], obbajeeba <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> I hope Satan doesn't take my soul. 
> I hope Jesus comes back to save me.
> Saying those words are NOT an insult to a Christian or the bible.
> I could rephrase; I hope Satan takes my soul.
> I hope Jesus does not save me.
> These too, are not an insult to a Christian or the bible.
> 
> Therefore, "my hope," that something (ban/banned) does not happen by way of 
> FFL, does not insult Rick. 
> 
> If I, out of nowhere started extremely insulting Rick and calling him names 
> and try to provoke him,then, I believe, that would be an insult to Rick, 
> depending on how successful I was at phrasing words together to get his goat, 
> which I have not attempted to. 
> Nabby, on the other hand, I delight at his sometimes weary mindsets. haha.
> At one time, Ravi was removed from FFL, and that was frightful to me at the 
> time. I never saw what he did that justified the removal. (Did he use 
> someone's real name?)  I do not remember.
> 
> If you notice there were (I am saying this for those newbies doing searches 
> for group boards on search engines where all of this FFL YAHOO GROUP, 
> intelligence is kept and seen.)  a few really good creative writers who no 
> longer post on the board. Why? Not because they were banned or removed. Maybe 
> they felt humiliated in some way and did not find it fun to post here 
> anymore. I miss those posters. They were the best writers and were very 
> inspirational. 
> So the word(s), ban or banned, as MJ has explained himself already today what 
> lead him to come to that conclusion. 
> I only jumped on the ban(d) wagon! Or is that off the ban(d) wagon?
> 
> All it takes is a ban(d) of conspirators to team up against anyone on this 
> board and push the limits that lead to bully band of biblical proportions and 
> then the big red button is pushed http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1XTDYiepMY 
> . I witnessed one poster removed and that is enough for me to have my gun 
> cocked ready to defend at the slightest sound of ban. 
> I am not wishing to insult Rick. I am not hoping to insult Rick.
> I am not wishing to be on your to do list, either, auth. ;)
> 
> ...and "Frankly, I don't give a damn."   :)
> 
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> >
> > Obba, if you say "I hope X doesn't happen," it means
> > you think X is a possibility.
> > 
> > And if you think it's possible that Michael would be
> > banned from FFL because of his negative views about
> > Maharishi, your thinking is *screwed up*. Frankly,
> > it's an insult to Rick.
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I like to read MJ's rants. Even if some say he lacks sound
> > > > > judgement, that is a symptom of the feelings he is going
> > > > > through. He appears to feel wronged by the movement, wronged
> > > > > by maharishi, and quite frankly, MJ has helped me see and
> > > > > feel some of my own disputes within. I know the difference
> > > > > between flame and substance. 
> > > > > It is important and I hope no one bans MJ just because he
> > > > > spews vile at something he feels mislead by.
> > > > 
> > > > And your thinking is just as screwed up as Michael's,
> > > > obba, if you believe there's even the slightest chance
> > > > he'd be banned from FFL for expressing his opinions.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > READERS OF YAHOO GROUPS AND SEARCH ENGINES EVERYWHERE:
> > > Posting on FFL is a pleasure and reading FFL is even more so. Pure 
> > > entertainment. 
> > > I have been a member for around 3 years and only post and read, when I 
> > > have time. Sometimes I delete hundreds of FFL posted group email forwards 
> > > from my email box, because I really don't have time to sift through all 
> > > of them and well, sometimes they get a bit boring hashing out the same 
> > > stories and critiques over and over, but for the most part, I enjoy this 
> > > YAHOO GROUP FFL, because it is uplifting to see so many people sharing 
> > > stories, mostly about enlightenment being sought. 
> > > I respect all posters on this FFL board, all those who have come and gone 
> > > and all those who continually stay the same. :)
> > > 
> > > The quote above auth snipped out, and snipped at with;
> > >  "And your thinking is just as screwed up as Michael's,
> > > obba, if you believe there's even the slightest chance
> > >  he'd be banned from FFL for expressing his opinions."
> > > 
> > > Geez. I am sorry, but I saw a word either, "ban, or banned," or both.   
> > > If it was Uncle fester or Ravi or even the Turq or Auth or Share or Ann 
> > > or Steve, or anyone else, I would have at the same moment in time seeing 
> > > the word(s), ban/banned, I may have had the same small time frame to 
> > > react and reply, because, I DON'T BELIEVE IN BANNING ANYONE." 
> > > Belief and opinions go hand in hand. It is not my belief MJ would be 
> > > banned, so my thinking is NOT screwed up. At least not in the context was 
> > > quoted above and why.  It is only that I have a life outside of FFL and 
> > > also have followed only one other culturing group than the TMO, that 
> > > would be FFL!  
> > > Thank you, Judy Auth, for pointing out what I would be if my beliefs were 
> > > true. :)  OXO 
> > > 
> > > ps. There may be a few mistakes, because I really have no time to proof 
> > > read, and I apologize to any grammar nazi's, if they are present.
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to