--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stanley@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > If Alex doesn't like it, why not let Buck do the moderating ? :-) > > > > > > > Well, in terms of people still here who posted early on, Dick Mays has top > > seniority at post #5, followed closely by Doug/Buck at #6. Buck's been > > chomping at the bit to whip this place into accord with Natural Law, so why > > not put him in charge of the whole thing? To put it another way, what would > > Maharishi do? Maharishi would chose Buck. > > With the posting limits gone we'll see a steady rising flood of anti-TMO- and > pro-Buddhist-propaganda from the Turq. He's been mocking Judy for been > responsible for the 50 limit, but the fact is that he was among the 5 top > posters that made the rule a necessity in the first place. > > Who knows what Maharishi would do, except having a good laugh at what is > going on here, but my vote goes to Buck. >
!Jai The Unified Field! I Be just a humble servant, -Buck
