--- In [email protected], "markmeredith2002"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In [email protected], "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > - In [email protected], "jyouells2000"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > I just remember what 'Jennifer' was told about gullable 
> > > > Americans, and think about Avon Park, South Fallsberg, Vedaland, 
> > > > Pacific Palisades, and all the others. Nothing to do with
> > > > Nature...
> > 
> >  
> > >  SO you think that Vedaland was never a serious venture...
> >  
> > > > Whether it was serious or not is irrelevant. How can we know? 
> > > > Serious money was made on the property in the end. That's how all 
> > > > these 'deals' work out in the end. It's a pattern that's 
> > > > difficult to ignore even though it has been obscured by all kinds
> > > > of crap.
> > 
> >  
> > > If MUM is ever sold, will you then claim that it was all 
> > > about the real estate investment?
> > 
> >  
> > > > It's not about real estate per se, it's about cash. And I don't 
> > > > even really care about that. I'm really interested in the 
> > > > truthfulness of the spiritual message. I don't want to waste 
> > > > my time. I don't want to mislead others into wasting theirs. 
> > > > 
> > > > Mum sends lots of cash elsewhere and it disappears. Why sell 
> > > > it, until it's no longer profitable.  
> >  
> > 
> > > Lots of cash? I guess there are a few rich people living near  
> > > MUM that donate directly to the movement, but its doubtful that 
> > > MUM itself is a profit-maker. *Break even* at best, I should
> > > think.
> > 
> > 
> > > > 'Profitable' in terms sending dollars to international, not
> > > > necessarily making a profit. And of course the property value 
> > > > goes up as renovation and developement takes place. 
> > > > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > If its not making a profit, then the only money that is getting
sent 
> > > is from donations. And you really can't claim that its ONLY for 
> > > investment purposes if the land/buildings are being put to their 
> > > intended use for the entire period that the property is owned.
> 
> The academic operations of MUM are probably breakeven but it is still
> a magnet for donations from around the country, not just FF.  Plus it
> obtains gov't grants as the state politicos still feel FF meditators
> are a bright economic engine in an economically lackluster state.  
> All the new buildings going up are funded by donations.  
> 
> No one is saying that MUM is just some real estate investment for 
> the TMO.  What we're saying is that the day MUM can no longer send 
> money to int'l or grow its real estate assets is the day the tmo 
> will decide to sell off MUM's real estate, transfer the proceeds to 
> int'l and move on to the next project.

You have said it much clearer than I did. I believe that's exactly how
it works. 

JohnY




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to