Thanks Auth! Yes, I see you have that correct, and rightly corrected!
My perspective was I forgot what order it should be in. It was somewhere housed in the brain, just a bit scrambled and I surely was not going to waste my time digging up the language history, because even today, the word, "gay," is not the same as long ago. "Ain't," is now a word. "Liberal," is now a different meaning, except I am getting confused to which one is correct anymore. hahaha. ....Lacking brain function when Gino sings that particular song and brings all kind of thoughts and almost causes a stutter. LOL. (Not necessarily about Gino, the wholeness of experience from remembering times, the people we know who we love and of course, Gino, gives us that handsome quality to reminisce, in whatever state of mind that brings us pleasant thoughts of long time love in our past, present and future. He is not my man, he reminds me of one fond memory that does not leave, so far, in this life. Dementia will be my salvation! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "card" <cardemaister@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > Shall maketh not? > > > > Sorry, should've emphasized: not with *any* auxiliary > > verb (shall, will, do...) > > Actually, card, if one is trying to simulate > Elizabethan English, it's the auxiliary verb that's > the wrong form here (the word order is wrong too). > > It should be: "Hair alone doth not Gino make." > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "card" <cardemaister@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Uh, no. Hair does not maketh Gino, alone. Gino has that umph. > > Uhumph.> > > > > > > > > Hmmm...methinks 'maketh' is a finite verb form? > > > > Thus, it ought not to be used with an auxiliary > > > > verb like 'do'?? >
