Yes. I have full respect to Auth. She is good at what she does. Although, I sometimes feel apprehensive with typing here, because, well, Auth appears like a word police, sort of like some people are to fashion and if my shoes/sandals don't match, (and sometimes they don't according to standards laid by hyped up media and I really don't care...sometimes. lol. At the least, I strut and wear them well! hahaha. I dig, Judy's digs. :)
Raunchy, since we have no post limit, what are some of the things you can relate to that you are hopeful to forget you did? Inquiring minds want to know! You can make metaphors as to keep it more in a fairy tale style as to not subject yourself to true embarrassment. --- In [email protected], "raunchydog" <raunchydog@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Thanks Auth! > > > > Editors are *supposed* to remember correct English usage. Looking stuff up is > for we mere mortals. Maybe dementia is prep for the next lifetime when > hopefully I''ll forget all the shit I did in this lifetime. > > > Yes, I see you have that correct, and rightly corrected! > > > > My perspective was I forgot what order it should be in. It was somewhere > > housed in the brain, just a bit scrambled and I surely was not going to > > waste my time digging up the language history, because even today, the > > word, "gay," is not the same as long ago. "Ain't," is now a word. > > "Liberal," is now a different meaning, except I am getting confused to > > which one is correct anymore. > > hahaha. > > ....Lacking brain function when Gino sings that particular song and brings > > all kind of thoughts and almost causes a stutter. LOL. > > (Not necessarily about Gino, the wholeness of experience from remembering > > times, the people we know who we love and of course, Gino, gives us that > > handsome quality to reminisce, in whatever state of mind that brings us > > pleasant thoughts of long time love in our past, present and future. He is > > not my man, he reminds me of one fond memory that does not leave, so far, > > in this life. Dementia will be my salvation! > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "card" <cardemaister@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Shall maketh not? > > > > > > > > Sorry, should've emphasized: not with *any* auxiliary > > > > verb (shall, will, do...) > > > > > > Actually, card, if one is trying to simulate > > > Elizabethan English, it's the auxiliary verb that's > > > the wrong form here (the word order is wrong too). > > > > > > It should be: "Hair alone doth not Gino make." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "card" <cardemaister@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Uh, no. Hair does not maketh Gino, alone. Gino has that umph. > > > > > > Uhumph.> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmmm...methinks 'maketh' is a finite verb form? > > > > > > Thus, it ought not to be used with an auxiliary > > > > > > verb like 'do'?? > > > > > >
