--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@...> wrote:
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" rorygoff@ wrote:
> 
> > > What I say is almost always, almost meaningless, and it almost
> > > always will be; it is merely a vehicle for transmitting love
> > > between us. That in my POV is as real as it gets.
> >
> > I take it back. *This* is the most egregious display of
> > ego I've ever seen.
> >
> Strange.  I think I know just what Rory is saying.

Well, of course you do.

> I don't see it as egotistical at all.

Well, of course you don't.

I know what he's saying too. It comes across to me as
egotistical. And phony as a three-dollar bill. (I'm
sure *he* thinks it's true, but that's the egotism,
IMHO.)

> 
> I mean, it also makes me think that I haven't missed anything by not
> reading it, but I understand what he is saying about the "transmitting"
>


Reply via email to