--- In [email protected], "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "RoryGoff" rorygoff@ wrote: > > > > What I say is almost always, almost meaningless, and it almost > > > always will be; it is merely a vehicle for transmitting love > > > between us. That in my POV is as real as it gets. > > > > I take it back. *This* is the most egregious display of > > ego I've ever seen. > > > Strange. I think I know just what Rory is saying.
Well, of course you do. > I don't see it as egotistical at all. Well, of course you don't. I know what he's saying too. It comes across to me as egotistical. And phony as a three-dollar bill. (I'm sure *he* thinks it's true, but that's the egotism, IMHO.) > > I mean, it also makes me think that I haven't missed anything by not > reading it, but I understand what he is saying about the "transmitting" >
