To coin a MMY term, I offer it up to the "play and display of creative intelligence". Live and let live etc. No need for me to pass judgment on it. Too many other things to do.
--- In [email protected], "authfriend" wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "seventhray27" steve.sundur@ wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "RoryGoff" rorygoff@ wrote: > > > > > > What I say is almost always, almost meaningless, and it almost > > > > always will be; it is merely a vehicle for transmitting love > > > > between us. That in my POV is as real as it gets. > > > > > > I take it back. *This* is the most egregious display of > > > ego I've ever seen. > > > > > Strange. I think I know just what Rory is saying. > > Well, of course you do. > > > I don't see it as egotistical at all. > > Well, of course you don't. > > I know what he's saying too. It comes across to me as > egotistical. And phony as a three-dollar bill. (I'm > sure *he* thinks it's true, but that's the egotism, > IMHO.) > > > > > I mean, it also makes me think that I haven't missed anything by not > > reading it, but I understand what he is saying about the "transmitting" > > >
