--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > [I wrote:] > > > > > Life doesn't work like that, Nabby. Again, you've > > > > > sealed yourself inside a little box you can't get out > > > > > of, all because you can't bring yourself to admit a > > > > > mistake. It wasn't even a very *important* mistake. > > > > > You could have just admitted it when I first pointed > > > > > it out, and that would have been that. Probably nobody > > > > > but me would have noticed. The longer you refuse to > > > > > admit what's obviously true, the harder it will become > > > > > to do so. > > > > > > > > I guess it's impossible for someone who in her own eyes are > > > > impeccable to admit having made false accusations. You > > > > continue to do so by keep making the same claims over and > > > > over again. > > > > > > No, because everything I've said about this has been true > > > and documented. > > > > No is isn't. > > Yes, it is.
No it isn't. > > > > You, in stark contrast, cannot offer any evidence for your > > > claims, because they're flat-out false. And you know it. > > > > You haven't shown any evidence of me answering your last > > post. That's a fact, one that probably has dawn on you > > long ago. > > I linked to both my last post and your answer to it about > four or five rounds ago, Nabby, as you well know. And carefully omitted, perhaps even deleted, your last post to make it look like I did answer your last post, which I did not. > > > > > If this has any value at all for other readers it will be > > > > that more persons than myself see that the Judy is not the > > > > Queen of Impeccability we thought she was. > > > > > > I'm not the "Queen of" anything, but as you know, Nabby, I > > > don't lie and haven't in this case. > > > > Yes you have. > > No, I have not. You have. No I haven't but you consistently lie about this topic. > > > No, you have been the > > > one telling the falsehoods, as anyone who checks out our > > > respective claims will discover. > > > > > > I know you're very anxious to get this off your back > > > without having to make that admission, > > > > I'm not, I couldn't care less. But my pitta gets aggravated > > when seeing someone lying through her teeth while trying to > > get away with it. > > Except that isn't what you're seeing. You're seeing somebody > refusing to let you get away with your accusation that *they* > are lying when, as you know, it's you. > > > but the only way > > > that's gonna happen is if you give me the last word. > > > Understand? > > > > So it's all about Judy getting the last word ? > > In this case it is. I do not let accusations that I am > dishonest stand. > > > Well I have news for you; you want have it because in this > > case you don't deserve it. > > You don't have any choice. So just carry on this "I never lie" conversation with yourself. I don't believe you and your failure to produce anything other than "I am right you are wrong" probably will make more people question you self-proclaimed "authority" regarding facts in the future.