I understood the difference, what Im pointing out is if someone here thinks they got enlightened by Chopra's meditation technique and they don't owe a debt to Maharishi for that they are mistaken based on what Chopra himself has said.
--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <LEnglish5@...> wrote: > > Well, he rewrote _Quantum Healing_, which was originally about the Primordial > Sound Technique, which has nothing to do with Primordial Sound Meditation, to > make it all about the latter. While he was at it, he deleted all references > to Maharishi, and how Maharishi had taught him the Primordial Sound Technique > and how to teach it, and actually asked him to write the book _Quantum > Healing_ in order to explain how it might work, but other than minor details > like that, yes, Chopra is quite honest about it... > > L > > --- In [email protected], srijau@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Chopra has made it very clear he would be nothing without Maharishi, there > > would certainly have been no primordial sound meditation. > > At least he is honest about it unlike certain others. > > > > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/deepak-chopra/the-maharishi-years-the-u_b_86412.html > > >
