Bob Price D, how you do stumble into brilliance, pointing out one of the most 
fun aspects of studying literature: different interpretations of the same 
piece! You with your vain and deluded king, me with my trembling in their boots 
subjects who consequently are willing to collude with their sovereign in his 
vanity and delusion. Does the child's utterance not sweep all characters up in 
one innocent observation?
PS I promise you on our sacred literary partnership that I have never sold any 
fluids, embalming or otherwise.    

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "bobpriced" <bobpriced@...> wrote:
>
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> >
> > Price, I often enjoy when Ravi gets upset. All I'm asking for is a little 
> > consistency. I realize it's very silly of me. 
> 
> ***I would say Raja Ravi is consistent about encouraging self awareness; I 
> can see where that might seem inconsistent, to old embalming fluid 
> salesmen---with little or no sense of humour.
> 
> > PS I think that child was making a deep observation as in: you grown ups 
> > are cracked!
> 
> ***and here I thought it was about the Emperor's vanity, thanks for the 
> clarification; what the hell was Hans Christian Andersen thinking.
> 
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YCJt6aTiAc
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Bob Price <bobpriced@>
> > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 1:06 PM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Religious delusional beliefs & the myth of 
> > the invincible, infallible Goddess
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > 
> > 
> > Share, are you saying when the child said: "But he isn't wearing anything 
> > at all!", he was making a fashion statement? 
> > 
> > I've never noticed Raja Ravi get upset, although he does quite often seem 
> > to make a meal out of Xeno's vanity.
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > From: Share Long <sharelong60@>
> > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 8:58:46 AM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Religious delusional beliefs & the myth of 
> > the invincible, infallible Goddess
> > 
> > Ravi, I realize you weren't talking about physical vulnerability. But why 
> > not? After all, you get quite upset when Xeno gets abstract! Of course, 
> > some folks also got upset when Xeno got not so abstract. Go figure!
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > From: Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@>
> > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 4:39 PM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Religious delusional beliefs & the myth of 
> > the invincible, infallible Goddess
> > 
> > Hi dear SHare - as Judy says, it's irrelevant, I was not talking about 
> > physical vulnerability. Plus you are Saint Share - you are the queen of 
> > vulnerability, always accountable, responsible to your actions, your 
> > emotions - the epitome of my dream woman - accountability, responsibility 
> > and self-honesty are thy attributes.
> > 
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:08 AM, authfriend <authfriend@> wrote:
> > 
> > >  
> > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> > >>
> > >
> > >> Ravi, aren't we all forever vulnerable to reality? Right now I'm 
> > >> breathing. Probably because my body is vulnerable to the reality of its 
> > >> need for oxygen in order to function. OTOH, even in the context of 
> > >> needing oxygen, what is THE reality? Some athletes take less breaths in 
> > >> a moment than I do. Some yogis can suspend breathing for a long time. 
> > >> People who have lived for a long time in very high mountains don't need 
> > >> as much oxygen in their air. So, even on this simple, physical level 
> > >> what is THE reality to which it is good to be vulnerable?
> > >
> > >
> > Share, that is just so *profound*. I'm sure Ravi will be
> > >grateful to you for pointing this out to him; it's so
> > >very *relevant* to his point.
> > >
> > >
> > 
> >    
> >
>


Reply via email to