--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <snip> > > You are on record here as admitting that the TM movement > > rips people off, and NOT CARING. You are on record here > > as having absolutely no problem with them never following > > through on any of their promises and grand schemes. It > > doesn't seem to bother you if the movement's leaders > > indulge in behavior that would be considered inappropriate, > > if not illegal, in ANY organization. You don't seem to > > have any problem with this stuff at all. > > Could you cite some of Lawson's posts here that > indicate all or any of the above? > > Because my impression is very different. It seems > to me that what Lawson does is question knee-jerk > criticism of the TMO and MMY (at the same time that > he has plenty of criticisms of his own).
I'm not sure what you, Judy, are referring to when you mention Lawson's questioning the knee-jerk reactions of others. Much of the conversation that has been going on at least regarding Hagelin's and Bevan's licentious behavior is information that has been verified first-hand. Many women have come forward, I have spoken to several women who were pretty shaken up after they had been called into Bevan's office, having no idea they were about to be propositioned. Who knows how many were put in this position. This is from the President of an accredited university. Imagine if it came to light that the President of Harvard, or University of Iowa or any college or university had done this repeatedly? One afternoon, While with dear friends, well-to-do's, I was privvy to a conversation from a husband, a large donor to the movement, whose wife had just admitted to him that she had been having an affair with Hagelin. While she was in the admission mode she made mention of a loop of married women that both Bevan and Hagelin had each been sleeping with. This was a massive shock to me. One of the men I was with at the time we heard this conversation told me this was all well-known fact and had been going on for quite some time. These are leaders of the movement who have no problem arrogantly chiding others for their lack in "living life in accord with Natural Law." This duplicitous life is being lived by the very people who we have placed our trust and faith in. > > It's possible to care, by the way, without > indulging in constant obsessive, thoughtless > condemnation. The absence of the latter does > not necessarily indicate the absence of the > former. > > (No, I'm not saying *all* criticism of the > TMO/MMY here is obsessive and thoughtless, but > there surely is a sizeable component thereof.) ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
