--- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote:
>
> I think what Charlie Lutes said about previous lives could be
> applied to anyone with whom there is a difference between
> their physical gender and their psychological gender.

Well, that wouldn't include most homosexuals, but that
was how it was originally presented. Perhaps you missed
what I wrote to Mike:

> > When you first posted this, you presented it as an
> > explanation for homosexuality. But a "super masculine"
> > man or "super feminine" woman (if you're talking about
> > appearance, which I believe you were when you posted
> > it before) could just as easily be gay as straight.
> > 
> > Likewise, gender dysphoria should not be confused with
> > homosexual preference. Often they go together, but
> > sometimes they don't. Most gays and lesbians don't want
> > to change their gender.

I should clarify this, having done a little research.

Gender dysphoria and sexual preference (in the sense of who
you're attracted to sexually) are independent of each other.
This gets complicated: apparently most gender-dysphoric
individuals regard themselves as heterosexual, which would
mean that a male who believes he's really female is sexually
attracted to other males. A gender-dysphoric man who was
attracted to women would consider himself homosexual.

But this is *not* the case with most homosexuals, who are
comfortable with their sexual identity, i.e., most homosexual
men don't want to be women.

(I think trying to scope out the past-life karma of any
particular individual based on Charlie's formula is a mug's
game, frankly. I'll stick with what we know from science,
if only because I find it a lot more interesting!)



> ________________________________
>  From: authfriend <authfriend@...>
> To: [email protected] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 7:38 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Pfc. Bradley Manning sentenced to 35 years
>  
> 
> 
>   
> --- In [email protected], "sharelong60" <sharelong60@> wrote:
> >
> > I think it was Mike Dixon who had what I think is a plausible 
> > explanation from Charlie Lutes: that a person is carrying non 
> > physical gender qualities over from a previous life time.
> 
> No, that had to do with homosexuals, not transgender
> individuals. Didn't make any sense for homosexuals,
> though. Charlie assumed homosexual men had feminine
> characteristics and homosexual women had masculine
> characteristics, an old stereotype that doesn't apply
> anywhere near across the board. And most homosexuals
> have no desire to be the opposite sex.
> 
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "Seraphita" <s3raphita@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > - In [email protected], "authfriend"  wrote:>
> > > > Manning says she's always been a woman in her mind/psyche.
> > > > 
> > > > This Manning "chap" becomes more embarrassing by the day.
> > > > From the Wiki article on the US Military and gays I read:
> > > > While restrictions on sexual orientation have been lifted, restrictions
> > > > on gender identity remain in place due to Department of Defense
> > > > regulations; transgender Americans thus continue to be barred from
> > > > military service.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry Chelsea - you're in the wrong line of work.
> > > 
> > > Not any more. She's been dishonorably discharged.
> > > 
> > > She said she joined the Army to try to overcome her sense
> > > that she was a woman. Now that the trial is over and she's
> > > out of the Army, she's decided to go for it.
> > > 
> > > FWIW, research is increasingly showing that gender dysphoria
> > > has biological causes. It's beginning to look as though a
> > > man, say, doesn't want to be a woman because he's screwed
> > > up, but is screwed up because he wants to be a woman.
> > > 
> > > It's hard to imagine what it must be like to feel you're in
> > > the wrong kind of body and to know that everybody thinks
> > > you're someone you know you aren't--and for this to be the
> > > case from the time you were a very little kid. That would
> > > mess with anyone's mind.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to