--- In [email protected], "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, even if I don't express it clearly in writing, it's not about > the sex per se, it's about ethics, and honesty and how that effects > both the teaching and the organiztion that supposedly represents that > teaching. [I just can't see how having sex with married women can be > defended as appropriate behavior (unless the couple agrees it's OK). > I'd certainly advise my daughters against it. It falls under 'averting > the pain that has not yet come']
That's it exactly. Anyone who can't see the potential for causing pain just can't "see." In my world view, which admittedly has been warped by my time with Rama and having been systematically trained in ways to "see", *everyone* is psychic. It's just that some people pretend not to be. Therefore, in a situation where two people are in a rela- tionship which is assumed to be monogamous and one person in that relationship has sex with someone else, the "cheated- on" party ALWAYS knows. He or she may *claim* that they don't know, but they ALWAYS know. Therefore, to enter into such a relationship, as the third party, means that you are willing to introduce that stress and tension into two other people's relationship. Bad ju-ju, IMO. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
