Not true Share. I commented independently, based on my objective observations of your posts that I read this morning in email; posts come out of order, remember and can be time-delayed? Obba has had a hard time with this, but it is the way it is these days. Don't assume. Now, what is the opposite of self-righteousness?
________________________________ From: Share Long <sharelon...@yahoo.com> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 10:02 AM Subject: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Drink More Water Judy forgets that Share replied yes about being aware of pundister's name. Emily comes to help Judy dig the rabbit hole even deeper. But at least Judy admits that it's not evident to her when someone is funning. Though she still thinks her TAKE on reality is reality! ________________________________ From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" <authfri...@yahoo.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 11:48 AM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Drink More Water Share, incapable of being straightforward, comments crookedly: Judy obsesses on Share and is clueless that someone might simply be funning on FFL. GF! She pretends not to remember that I asked her whether she knew who punditster was: authfriend wrote: You're really not aware that "punditster" is Richard Williams, Share? Given that she had written-- "pundister [sic], whoever you are" "pundister [sic], whoever that is" --it wasn't evident that she was "funning," especially given her general all-around cluelessness. I'm not sure even now that she was "funning," given her penchant for dishonesty when reality bites her on the ass. ________________________________ From: "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 11:25 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Drink More Water Share prevaricated: I am aware of that, yes. I like calling him pundister. GF! >From Share's post: "pundister, whoever you are" "pundister, whoever that is" BTW, it's punditster, not "pundister." And in case anybody's been thinking they have to conform to Richard's "rules," you don't. He has no more authority than anybody else regarding how to format your posts. Whatever works for you, IOW. authfriend wrote: You're really not aware that "punditster" is Richard Williams, Share? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: pundister, whoever you are, yes, very helpful, but more importantly IMHO, you made me LOL, thank you pundister, whoever that is, wrote: I guess this is the point where we get up close and personal. Go figure. Share continues: PS Ok, I've gone and figured out some Neo stuff. Will next experiment with the bolding situation as instructed by albion (-:
