oh, okay. but I've noticed that you seem to be the only one who regularly brings this up. maybe it is a matter of upbringing, although I thought mine was pretty traditional with regard to manners and such. (obviously my grammar and writing structure has taken a turn for the worse)
________________________________ From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:59 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) I guess it's just my instinct--the way I was brought up--to apologize if I've gotten something as badly wrong as Share did (and often does). It's not really a matter of "owing" an apology so much as noticing who has that instinct and who doesn't. ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote: You've got to wonder how many people owe Judy an apology on this forum? And how many owe her more than one? Maybe a hundred and a thousand! Judy, are you by chance keeping a tally? ________________________________ From: "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:32 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Oh, what a stinging rebuke... (Notice no apology from Share for her incredibly dense misunderstanding. Now, that's balance for you.) ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote: And being balanced in any way isn't your best thing, Judy. ________________________________ From: "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:19 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) You're wrong again, Share. Thinking isn't your best thing. ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote: Right, Judy and you just happened to bring it up after I had written HuffPost. It had absolutely nothing to do with that. I don't think so! ________________________________ From: "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:10 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) It's so very hard to believe the stupidity isn't a put-on. Hate to burst your Stupid Bubble, Share, but I wasn't suggesting you should put a definite article before "HuffPo." You shouldn't. My comment referred to the fact that you frequently do leave out the definite article where you SHOULD have one, yet you boast of having taken this advanced grammar course. She isn't going to get it. I know she isn't going to get it. There just aren't enough brain cells to accommodate something this complicated. ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote: Judy wrote & apparently forgot she did: Did this grammar course teach you to leave out the definite article? Because I had written: One of my favorite courses in college was an advanced grammar course. The errors I see now even on places like HuffPost amaze me. Ok, this exchange happened under the Lucid Dreaming thread. I guess that's why Judy thinks it was imaginary! ________________________________ From: "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:01 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) I'd say it was, "Oh, how quickly they imagine things that never happened!" ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote: Oh how quickly they forget! ________________________________ From: "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:26 PM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Which "FFL editor" would that be, Share? ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote: Very bad, turq. According to FFL Editor, you're supposed to say THE HuffPost! Faite attention, s'il vous plait! ________________________________ From: turquoiseb <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:18 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) snip I posted a link to a funny article in HuffPost about Whole Foods. Only a few people here commented (thanks) on how funny it was. Instead, within six posts Judy had adopted an argumentative tone in a thread about a funny article, and within eleven posts she was calling someone a liar. At last count there were 137 posts in the thread, *most* of them about the tempest in a pisspot she created and then refused to let die. Can you say "shifting context?" Can you say "Doing it for your own petty, self-serving reasons?" I think you can.
