Judy, you've gone totally bonkers. Again! Not only did I not call you a liar, but when turq called you that, I actually replied to him that you changed your mind and I did not consider that lying. I was defending you not trying to *get* you!
________________________________ From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:05 AM Subject: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Ann wrote: Who wants an apology? I think the lady was looking for factual back up of Xeno's assertions about her. No, this was actually about Share having made one of her idiotic bloopers trying to "get" me in a post to Barry, then resisting the facts tooth and nail, making mistake after mistake, to the point of calling me a liar, then claiming I wasn't "balanced." I observed that she hadn't apologized for all the mistakes or the accusations, suggesting that this didn't exactly say much for her own balance. Steve assumed, incorrectly and nastily, that I was demanding an apology; I set him straight, but Barry only read Steve's post and decided to pile on. However, on the subject of theoretical apologies, what does it say about someone who can notapologize? Or who thinks apologies are never warranted? My theory: that kind of person is incapable of apologizing because their ego is so bloated while at the same time fragile. That wouldn't be you, would it dreamboat? Exactly. Is Barry still barging into your dreams and trying to snuggle up to you, BTW?
