and that was the kind of mentality they got from Marshy - ignore it if you like
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 10/11/13, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com <dhamiltony...@yahoo.com> wrote:

 Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Pricing TM to Teach [more] 
Meditators
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Friday, October 11, 2013, 3:14 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
     
       
       
       Look, the bottom 20 percent of
 people live under poverty.  The next 20 percent of workers
 live just
 at or above poverty.  The next third of workers live just
 above that.
  These all are of the working poor.  At 60 percent of the
 work force
 we are only yet at the shrinking middle class, at people who
 could
 buy cars, buy houses, and educate their kids.  Here in
 Jefferson
 County nearly a third of kids under 21 live in poverty. This
 is the
 reality and the TM-Raja hope for someone to walk in to TM
 palaces who
 will pay full freight.  Slim chance.  
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
  A
 day's wage for a working retail worker, about $55. TM
 charges $1,500
 to learn meditation. Kind of
 embarrassing. 
 
 We're
 talking working people.  A living
 wage:
 
 
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/09/12/221741963/d-c-mayor-vetos-living-wage-law-targeting-large-retailers
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
  Changes
 certainly can be made and it
 is time for the TM-Rajas in charge of the well-being of TM
 to make
 certain changes such that meditation should be much more
 widely
 taught.  I just spoke with someone teaching at a Peace
 Palace in
 Chicago.  Ditto elsewhere.  They just are not teaching
 enough to once
 again become significant in culture again.  Significance. 
 The
 numbers being taught are a pittance and quite evidently the
 pricing
 is still an obstruction to any significant numbers learning
 TM.
 
 
  
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
  You know, Maharishi was
 very able to adapt course to circumstances as he went along.
  It is
 certainly time for the TM-Rajas to adapt course so the
 movement can
 teach once again.  I am reminded of the time that Maharishi
 was in
 Fairfield as the Domes were being built.  One morning he
 came in to
 the group meditation over at the campus field house and sat
 with it. 
 He got to talking with the group there.  Someone asked about
 the Age
 of Enlightenment technique and Maharishi asked if everyone
 did not
 have it?  On seeing hands go up for those who did not he
 then said
 everyone should have it.  That day arrangements were made
 for people
 then to get it.   That was done, no money charged for an
 $850
 technique.  Bevan taught it to people then for free.
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
 And who
 made that decision to "create" the Rajas? Your
 much vaunted Marshy - says a lot don't it?
 
 
 
  
      On Friday, October 11, 2013 12:15 AM,
 "dhamiltony2k5@..." <dhamiltony2k5@...>
 wrote:
     
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
     
       
       
       “Rich
 people just care less,”
 Well
 then, pretty obviously the TM-Rajas being pre-select for
 wealth are
 too remote to understand the
 problem.
 
 
 
 
 Since
 the 1970s, the gap between the rich and everyone else has
 skyrocketed. Income inequality is at its highest level in a
 century.
 This widening gulf between the haves and have-less troubles
 me, but
 not for the obvious reasons. Apart from the financial
 inequities, I
 fear the expansion of an entirely different gap, caused by
 the
 inability to see oneself in a less advantaged person’s
 shoes.
 Reducing the economic gap may be impossible without also
 addressing
 the gap in
 empathy.
 
 
 
 
 This
 has profound implications for societal behavior and
 government
 policy. Tuning in to the needs and feelings of another
 person is a
 prerequisite to empathy, which in turn can lead to
 understanding,
 concern and, if the circumstances are right, compassionate
 action.
  
 
 
 
 
 
 “Turning
 a blind eye. Giving someone the cold shoulder. Looking down
 on
 people. Seeing right through
 them.
 
 These
 metaphors for condescending or dismissive behavior are more
 than just
 descriptive. They suggest, to a surprisingly accurate
 extent, the
 social distance between those with greater power and those
 with
 less” 
 
 
 
 
 
 
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/05/rich-people-just-care-less/?exprod=myyahoo&_r=1
 
 
 
     
      
 
     
     
 
 
 
 
      
 
 
     
      
 
     
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to