What you need is English reading lessons. If you understood what you read, then 
you could come up with analogies that were actually relevant.
 
Michael wrote:

 > Its called an analogy - I thought Willy Tex was the only one who required 
 > English writing lessons.
 --------------------------------------------
 On Thu, 10/24/13, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... <authfriend@... 
mailto:authfriend@...> wrote:
 
 Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Re: Before evangelizing TM, 
consider your target audience
 To: [email protected] mailto:[email protected]
 Date: Thursday, October 24, 2013, 12:44 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Huh?? You seem to have been hallucinating. I
 don't believe I said anything about the Unified Field or
 the Ultimate Deity or Self-referral. 
 Michael wrote:
 
 > So its all
 merely the confirmation of what Bucky is always yapping
 about - > the Unified Field
 is the Ultimate Deity cause all you guys who holler
 at > each other are
 merely being Self-Referral! WHeeeeeeee! 
 
 --------------------------------------------
 
 On Thu, 10/24/13, authfriend@... <authfriend@...>
 wrote:
 
 
 
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Re: Before
 evangelizing TM, consider your target audience
 
 To: [email protected] mailto:[email protected]
 
 Date: Thursday, October 24, 2013, 2:06 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 What really awes me about Barry's Formula
 
 is the projection. You will almostalways
 
 find at least one instance in a given rant of his
 scornfully
 
 accusingothers
 
 of something he frequently does
 
 himself--and often, as in this case,in the same post in
 which he
 
 makes the accusation.
 
 I
 
 have never seen anybody else do this anywhere near so
 
 blatantly, nor socompletely
 
 obliviously. It speaks of a near-total absence of
 
 self-knowledge,which
 
 is quite amazing for someone who has supposedly been on
 
 aspiritual
 
 path (or nonpath) for almost 50 years.
 
 Ann
 
 wrote:
 
 >
 
 Barry's formula:> > 1)
 
 Write some screed peppered with untruths, exaggerations,
 
 illogical conclusions and >
 
 irrelevant factoids.> > 2) Put
 
 it out there and to see what happens knowing or not
 knowing
 
 how bogus or insulting or> just
 
 plain repetitive it is.>> 3) Act
 
 like you knew exactly what was going to happen as a result
 
 (somehow, in the dustier>
 
 regions of your brain realizing others with a modicum of
 
 sense and rationality feel it incumbent> to
 
 address the array of idiocy in your posts) and drag out
 the
 
 usual suspects in the form of>
 
 analysis of what the responders were reacting
 
 to.>> 4) Pat
 
 yourself on the back for having "gotten" us all
 
 with your carefully laid trap.>> 5)
 
 Pour yourself another beer while oogling the happy,
 romantic
 
 couples at the next table and>
 
 imagining that you too could be one of them - if only you
 
 weren't so busy keeping the cretins at> FFL in
 
 line. 
 
 I
 
 wrote:
 
 Note
 
 that it was Judy who addressed Barry's message, and
 
 Barry who tried to shoot her for doing so in order to
 
 ignore her
 
 message. And he's utterly oblivious to the blatant
 
 projection. 
 
 Barry wrote:(snip)
 
 
 
 >
 
 This is just an exercise in "Shoot the messenger, so
 we
 
 can ignore
 
 > the message."
 
 
 
 > 
 
 > It's pure REACTIVITY, otherwise known as
 
 "getting your buttons
 
 > pushed," otherwise known as "getting your
 
 panties in a twist."
 
 Actually it's known as having
 
 fun puncturing Barry's incompetentattempts at "get
 the
 
 TMO" analysis and his hugely inflated ego.
 
 
 
 
 
 > You can tell how MUCH
 
 they got their buttons pushed when they
 
 > become so desperate as to try to turn the latter
 
 extremely common
 
 > phrase into a sexual aberration as part of their
 
 "Shoot the
 
 > messenger" routine. 
 
 :-)
 
 Ooooo, got 'im. (Barry often
 
 touts the ability to laugh at oneself, buthe couldn't
 do it if you put a
 
 gun to his head.)
 
 
 
 
 
 > It's not as if
 
 anyone but the other members of the Mean Girls Club
 
 > pay any attention to them. They're just
 apologists
 
 for Bad Ideas
 
 > and Bad Behavior, not very bright, and given to
 
 tantrums of
 
 > reactivity.
 
 Says Barry, having a tantrum of
 
 reactivity--otherwise known asBad Behavior--because his
 
 not-very-bright thoughts were
 
 shownto be Bad
 
 Ideas.
 
 
 
 > Me, I just post what
 
 I think, and allow them to react.
 
 
 
 >
 
 > It's the oldest dictum of education: Don't
 
 describe, *demonstrate*.
 
 > I provide the stimulus, they demonstrate. 
 
 :-)
 
 Uh-huh. He really believes this,
 
 folks. 

Reply via email to